» Articles » PMID: 36120883

Partnership to Develop and Deliver Curriculum Supporting Student-led Air Quality Research in Rural Washington State

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This article describes the process and educational materials developed and implemented for high school students through a partnership between an urban public university and a rural, non-profit university. This specific partnership was novel but originated within a long-standing community-academic partnership. This project took place in a rural community impacted by air pollution and a higher asthma hospitalization rate compared with the rest of the state.

Objectives: The objectives of this article are to describe the development and implementation of a high school program where students conducted their own research on local air quality using low-cost monitors with the guidance of undergraduate student mentors.

Methods: University faculty, researchers, and students collaborated to develop an air quality curriculum relevant to local issues. This curriculum was delivered to high school students through an existing after school program, and guided students in conducting their own research on community air pollution. The students used university-provided low-cost monitors for their research, and presented their research to community members. Student learning was supported through hands-on activities and conducting research projects. Student projects examined air quality variation indoors within their school, outdoors in their community, and at home.

Conclusions: This curriculum can be adapted for use with students in many different communities. It will likely be most successful and engaging if adapted to local air pollution sources and issues, and implemented through an existing programmatic structure with a high mentor to student ratio.

References
1.
Achilleos S, Kioumourtzoglou M, Wu C, Schwartz J, Koutrakis P, Papatheodorou S . Acute effects of fine particulate matter constituents on mortality: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Environ Int. 2017; 109:89-100. PMC: 5689473. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.09.010. View

2.
Perla M, Iman E, Campos L, Perkins A, Liebman A, Miller M . Agricultural occupational health and safety perspectives among Latino-American youth. J Agromedicine. 2015; 20(2):167-77. PMC: 5798607. DOI: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1010064. View

3.
Postma J . Elucidating empowerment in El Proyecto Bienestar (the Well-Being Project). J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(4):441-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04605.x. View

4.
Masterson E, Younglove L, Perez A, Torres E, Krenz J, Tchong French M . The home air in agriculture pediatric intervention (HAPI) trial: Rationale and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020; 96:106085. PMC: 7494646. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106085. View

5.
Hofmann J, Crowe J, Postma J, Ybarra V, Keifer M . Perceptions of environmental and occupational health hazards among agricultural workers in Washington State. AAOHN J. 2009; 57(9):359-71. PMC: 2882378. DOI: 10.3928/08910162-20090817-01. View