Clinical Significance of Protective Motivation Intervention Nursing on Functional Recovery of Patients After Hip Arthroplasty

Overview

Journal Biomed Res Int

Publisher Wiley

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Biotechnology
General Medicine

Date 2022 Sep 19

PMID 36119938

Authors

Xue Yuan

Fengqin Xu

Shou Lin Zhu

Lijuan Huo

Ying Chen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical significance of protective motivation intervention nursing on functional recovery of patients after hip arthroplasty.

Methods: Sixty patients after hip arthroplasty treated in our hospital from February 2019 to April 2021 were selected. The patients were randomly divided into the control group and the research group. The routine nursing mode was adopted in the control group, and the protective motivation intervention nursing mode was adopted in the research group. Nursing satisfaction, FIM score, Harris hip function score, WOMAC score, Barthel index score, and quality of life score were compared between the two groups.

Results: The nursing satisfaction of the research group was higher than that of the control group, and there are statistically significant differences between the groups ( < 0.05). The FIM scores of the research group at discharge and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge were significantly higher than those in the control group. The Harris hip function score of the research group was significantly higher than that of the control group at discharge and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge. The WOMAC scores of the research group at discharge and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). The scores of the Barthel index at discharge and 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after discharge in the research group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The scores of physiological function, psychological function, social function, and health self-cognition in the research group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05).

Conclusion: The nursing model of protective motivation intervention for patients after hip arthroplasty can effectively improve the function of hip joint, improve the quality of life, promote the establishment of harmonious nurse-patient relationship, and play a positive role in improving the prognosis of patients.

Citing Articles

Retracted: Clinical Significance of Protective Motivation Intervention Nursing on Functional Recovery of Patients after Hip Arthroplasty.

International B Biomed Res Int. 2024; 2023:9861286.

PMID: 38188751 PMC: 10769682. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9861286.

References

Jain S, Lamb J, Townsend O, Scott C, Kendrick B, Middleton R . Risk factors influencing fracture characteristics in postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty : a multicentre observational cohort study on 584 fractures. Bone Jt Open. 2021; 2(7):466-475. PMC: 8325979. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0027.R1. View

Zhang J, Gu L, Xu Y, Zhao B, Li D, Xiao C . Integrated Medical Care and the Continuous 4C Nursing Model to Improve Nursing Quality and Clinical Treatment of Patients with Acute Stroke: Based on a Retrospective Case-Control Study. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022; 2022:4810280. PMC: 9192255. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4810280. View

Tatani I, Solou K, Panagopoulos A, Lakoumentas J, Kouzelis A, Megas P . Short-term clinical and radiological results of two different design metaphyseal fitting femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):316. PMC: 8127309. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02465-8. View

Agrawal Y, Vasudev A, Sharma A, Cooper G, Stevenson J, Parry M . Morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty surgery during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK at a single-speciality orthopaedic hospital. Bone Jt Open. 2021; 2(5):323-329. PMC: 8168543. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.25.BJO-2021-0001.R1. View

Jeschke E, Citak M, Halder A, Heller K, Niethard F, Schrader P . Blood transfusion and venous thromboembolism trends and risk factors in primary and aseptic revision total hip and knee arthroplasties: A nationwide investigation of 736,061 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021; 108(1):102987. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102987. View

Ramadanov N, Bueschges S, Liu K, Lazaru P, Marintschev I . Comparison of short-term outcomes between direct anterior approach (DAA) and SuperPATH in total hip replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1):324. PMC: 8136223. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02315-7. View

Hu S, Xiong R, Hu Q, Li Q . Effects of Nursing Intervention Based on Health Belief Model on Self-Perceived Burden, Drug Compliance, and Quality of Life of Renal Transplant Recipients. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022; 2022:3001780. PMC: 9098356. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3001780. View

Meng X, Yu Y . Effect of Rehabilitation Nursing under the Guidance of the Health Action Process Approach Model on Perioperative Nursing Effect of Artificial Hip Arthroplasty: Effect on Promoting Quality of Life and Postoperative Rehabilitation. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022; 2022:1247002. PMC: 9019436. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1247002. View

Xie H, Ma H, Zhang S, Li J, Han Q, Chen H . Impact of edaravone on serum CXC chemokine ligand-13 levels and perioperative neurocognitive disorders in elderly patients with hip replacement. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021; 134(13):1610-1615. PMC: 8280092. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001492. View

10.

Sathiadoss P, Schieda N, Haroon M, Osman H, Alrasheed S, Flood T . Utility of Quantitative T2-Mapping Compared to Conventional and Advanced Diffusion Weighted Imaging Techniques for Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Men with Hip Prosthesis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021; 55(1):265-274. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27803. View

11.

French J, Bramley P, Scattergood S, Sandiford N . Adverse reaction to metal debris due to fretting corrosion between the acetabular components of modular dual-mobility constructs in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 2021; 6(5):343-353. PMC: 8183148. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200146. View

12.

Haider T, Seilern Und Aspang J, Gahleitner C, Plesser S, Hajdu S . Does patient positioning influence blood loss and transfusion rate in hip replacement for femoral neck fractures? A single-centre, retrospective chart review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):496. PMC: 8164291. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04375-6. View

13.

Ellison J, Boychuk L, Chakravorty D, Chandran A, Conly J, Howatt A . A comparison of surgical site infections following total hip replacement and total knee replacement surgeries identified by Infection Prevention and Control and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Alberta, Canada. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021; 43(4):435-441. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.159. View

14.

Goldstein J, Babikian G, Rana A, Mackenzie J, Millar A . The Cost and Outcome Effectiveness of Total Hip Replacement: Technique Choice and Volume-Output Effects Matter. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016; 14(6):703-718. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0260-3. View

15.

Olsson L, Hansson E, Ekman I . Evaluation of person-centred care after hip replacement-a controlled before and after study on the effects of fear of movement and self-efficacy compared to standard care. BMC Nurs. 2016; 15(1):53. PMC: 5017008. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-016-0173-3. View

16.

Hwang W, Kim M . Risk Perception & Risk-Reduction Behavior Model for Blue-Collar Workers: Adapted From the Health Promotion Model. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:538198. PMC: 7671966. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.538198. View

17.

Jin X, Gibson A, Gale J, Schneuer F, Ding D, March L . Does weight loss reduce the incidence of total knee and hip replacement for osteoarthritis?-A prospective cohort study among middle-aged and older adults with overweight or obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021; 45(8):1696-1704. PMC: 8310800. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-021-00832-3. View