» Articles » PMID: 36119251

Association of Long and Short Interpregnancy Intervals with Maternal Outcomes

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Sep 19
PMID 36119251
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Interpregnancy interval (IPI) is spacing between live birth and beginning a new pregnancy. Both long and short IPIs have been associated with adverse maternal outcomes. There is paucity in the Indian literature regarding the impact of IPI on maternal outcomes.

Materials And Methodology: The cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, from July 2019 to June 2020. Women with previous abortions, previous stillbirth, nulliparity, or multiple pregnancies were excluded. A pre-structured pro forma was used for demographic details. IPI was categorized as <6 months, 6 to <24 months, 24 to <60 months, and 60 months. Maternal outcomes were studied, and odds ratios were calculated.

Results: There were 6984 deliveries in the period. A total of 4812 women were enrolled after following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of 4812 women, 142 (2.9%) had IPI <6 months, 3336/4812 women (69.3%) had IPI 6 to <24 months, 1144/4812 women (23.7%) had IPI 24 to <60 months, and 3.9% women (190/4812) had IPI ≥60 months. High risk of fetal malposition (OR 3.84), fetal growth restriction (OR 2.06), and hypertension (OR 1.86) were seen in women with short IPI <6 months. Women with longer IPI (≥ 60 months) had higher chances of preterm labor (OR 3.82), oligoamnios (OR 2.54), gestational diabetes (OR 2.19), and anemia (OR 1.45).

Conclusion: Three-fourths of women had IPI less than 24 months recommended as minimum interval by WHO. Efforts are needed to increase awareness and availability of contraceptive choices for postpartum women to ensure adequate spacing.

Citing Articles

Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse perinatal outcomes according to maternal age in the context of China's two-child policy.

Xiu S, Tang L, Qin C, Tian D, Chen Y, Gu L BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):81.

PMID: 39871180 PMC: 11770942. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07136-8.


Perinatal outcomes and predictors of placental abruption: a retrospective study in an Ethiopian tertiary care center.

Tadese M, Getachew G, Kebede T, Yesuf T, Tessema S, Damesa W Front Public Health. 2025; 12():1453117.

PMID: 39839380 PMC: 11746074. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1453117.


The prevalence of short inter-pregnancy interval and its associated risk factors among women attending primary health care centers of NGHA in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Hemedy R, Wali R, Alsulimani F J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(9):4016-4024.

PMID: 39464900 PMC: 11504773. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_549_24.


Predicting adverse birth outcome among childbearing women in Sub-Saharan Africa: employing innovative machine learning techniques.

Ngusie H, Mengiste S, Zemariam A, Molla B, Tesfa G, Seboka B BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2029.

PMID: 39075434 PMC: 11285398. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19566-8.


Interbirth interval and maternal anaemia in 21 sub-Saharan African countries: A fractional-polynomial analysis.

Mruts K, Gebremedhin A, Tessema G, Scott J, Pereira G PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0275155.

PMID: 36149878 PMC: 9506648. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275155.

References
1.
Hanley G, Hutcheon J, Kinniburgh B, Lee L . Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: An Analysis of Successive Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129(3):408-415. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001891. View

2.
Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan J . Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2000; 321(7271):1255-9. PMC: 27528. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7271.1255. View

3.
Conde-Agudelo A, Belizan J, Norton M, Rosas-Bermudez A . Effect of the interpregnancy interval on perinatal outcomes in Latin America. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106(2):359-66. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171118.79529.a3. View

4.
Zhu B . Effect of interpregnancy interval on birth outcomes: findings from three recent US studies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 89 Suppl 1:S25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.08.002. View

5.
Ball S, Pereira G, Jacoby P, de Klerk N, Stanley F . Re-evaluation of link between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes: retrospective cohort study matching two intervals per mother. BMJ. 2014; 349:g4333. PMC: 4137882. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g4333. View