» Articles » PMID: 36118980

Vasectomy Regret or Lack Thereof

Overview
Date 2022 Sep 19
PMID 36118980
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Vasectomy is a procedure that results in permanent yet reversible sterility and remains a great contraceptive option for many. Previous research studies have highlighted frequency of vasectomy utilization, defining characteristics of individuals who opt for this method, various surgical techniques, and the risks and benefits associated with the procedure. What remains to be defined is why or why not individuals may experience post-vasectomy regret and whether the previous characteristics correlate.

Objective: The objective of this review is to synthesize information regarding reasons individuals may regret their vasectomy and seek reversal, what options exist for accomplishing the reversal, and patients' fertility prognosis post-vasovasostomy.

Methods: This review utilized a combination of secondary and tertiary data analysis across a wide scope of academic databases pertaining to the topic of interest.

Results: Typically, most males who have sought a vasectomy are satisfied with their decision, however, approximately 6% of this population seeks reversal. Key factors influencing vasectomy regret include age at the time of vasectomy, parental status, pre- and post-operative relationship status, unresolved physical and psychosexual problems, and development of chronic scrotal pain following the procedure. Few options exist for vasectomy reversal including microsurgical reconstructive vasectomy reversal (VR) and sperm extraction for in vitro fertilization. There is no guarantee that fertility will be restored in any case but a major predictive factor for success is the time interval prior to reversal.

Conclusion: Vasectomy is intended to be a permanent form of contraception; however, a minor chance remains that individuals may experience post-operative regret due to various factors. This warrants proper comprehensive counseling by the patient's provider regarding benefits and risks, procedural outcomes, opportunities for reversal, and fertility prognosis.

Citing Articles

Comparing vasectomy techniques, recovery and complications: tips and tricks.

Borrell J, Gu C, Ye N, Mills J, Andino J Int J Impot Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39890927 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5.


Definition of a European pre-vasectomy scoring system to identify patients at risk of vasectomy regret.

Degraeve A, Tosco L, Tombal B, Roumeguere T, Beirnaert J, Hamal R Sex Med. 2025; 12(6):qfae094.

PMID: 39850147 PMC: 11757006. DOI: 10.1093/sexmed/qfae094.


Patient perspectives on vasectomy: findings from a TikTok® content analysis.

Tzelves L, Talyshinskii A, Nedbal C, Mykoniatis I, Beisland C, Roth I Int J Impot Res. 2024; .

PMID: 38877106 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-00931-5.


Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After .

Nguyen V, Li M, Leach M, Patel D, Hsieh T Am J Mens Health. 2024; 18(3):15579883241260511.

PMID: 38872304 PMC: 11179492. DOI: 10.1177/15579883241260511.

References
1.
Dubin J, White J, Ory J, Ramasamy R . Vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization: a contemporary, comparative analysis. Fertil Steril. 2021; 115(6):1377-1383. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.050. View

2.
Awsare N, Krishnan J, Boustead G, Hanbury D, McNicholas T . Complications of vasectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005; 87(6):406-10. PMC: 1964127. DOI: 10.1308/003588405X71054. View

3.
Lipshultz L, Rumohr J, Bennett R . Techniques for vasectomy reversal. Urol Clin North Am. 2009; 36(3):375-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.05.011. View

4.
Jenkins I, Blacklock N . Reversal of vasectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1979; 17(2):144-7. DOI: 10.1002/j.1879-3479.1979.tb00138.x. View

5.
Hancock P, McLaughlin E . British Andrology Society guidelines for the assessment of post vasectomy semen samples (2002). J Clin Pathol. 2002; 55(11):812-6. PMC: 1769802. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.55.11.812. View