» Articles » PMID: 36117568

Effects of Dose Change on the Success of Clinical Trials

Overview
Date 2022 Sep 19
PMID 36117568
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The search for disease modifying therapies in Alzheimers disease (AD) has recently led to promising results but also revealed design issues in clinical trials themselves. Of particular importance is the potential statistical challenges that can arise when dosages change after an interim analysis, which is not uncommon in contemporary AD trials. Following the recent Aducanumab trials, we sought to study the implications of dose changes on the statistical power of an AD trial. We conducted extensive simulations to calculate statistical power when the relationship between treatment effect size and time is linear or non-linear, and the investigated drug has delayed treatment effect or not. Statistical power depends on many design factors including the dose change time, correlation, population homogeneity, and treatment effect time. We recommend that researchers conduct simulation studies at the interim analysis to justify the modified sample size and/or follow-up time modification meanwhile the type I and II error rates are controlled.

Citing Articles

Sample size calculation for the sequential parallel comparison design with binary endpoint using exact methods.

Shan G, Zhang Y J Appl Stat. 2025; 52(3):656-668.

PMID: 39950014 PMC: 11816656. DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2024.2385997.


Continuity corrected Wilson interval for the difference of two independent proportions.

Shan G, Lou X, Wu S J Stat Theory Appl. 2023; 22(1-2):38-53.

PMID: 37982044 PMC: 10655805. DOI: 10.1007/s44199-023-00054-8.


Response adaptive randomization design for a two-stage study with binary response.

Shan G J Biopharm Stat. 2023; 33(5):575-585.

PMID: 36735855 PMC: 10397367. DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2170399.


Monte Carlo cross-validation for a study with binary outcome and limited sample size.

Shan G BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022; 22(1):270.

PMID: 36253749 PMC: 9578204. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02016-z.

References
1.
Miller J, Shan G, Lombardo J, Jimenez-Maggoria G . Biomedical informatics applications for precision management of neurodegenerative diseases. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018; 4:357-365. PMC: 6118097. DOI: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.03.007. View

2.
Clifton L, Birks J, Clifton D . Comparing different ways of calculating sample size for two independent means: A worked example. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018; 13:100309. PMC: 6297128. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.100309. View

3.
Shan G . Sample size calculation for agreement between two raters with binary endpoints using exact tests. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016; 27(7):2132-2141. DOI: 10.1177/0962280216676854. View

4.
Fillit H, Green A . Aducanumab and the FDA - where are we now?. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021; 17(3):129-130. DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-00454-9. View

5.
Cummings J, Salloway S . Aducanumab: Appropriate use recommendations. Alzheimers Dement. 2021; 18(3):531-533. PMC: 8792094. DOI: 10.1002/alz.12444. View