» Articles » PMID: 36110286

Acute Effects of Real and Imagined Endurance Exercise on Sustained Attention Performance

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2022 Sep 16
PMID 36110286
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated acute effects of real and imagined endurance exercise on sustained attention performance in healthy young adults in order to shed light on the action mechanisms underlying changes in cognitive functioning. The neural similarities between both imagined and physically performed movements reveal that imagery induces transient hypofrontality, whereas real exercise reflects both transient hypofrontality effects and the global release of signaling factors (e.g., BDNF or serotonin) due to muscle contraction and the accompanying sensory feedback. We hypothesized improved cognitive functioning after both interventions (imagery and physical endurance exercise) with greater improvements for real exercise because it targets both mechanisms. Fifty-three sport science students completed two 25-min sessions of moderate endurance exercise in either a motor imagery modality or an executed bodily activity within the framework of an order-balanced crossover study. Assessments for sustained attention performance (d2-R) were performed before and after each endurance exercise condition. Statistical results showed improvements for both groups over time, which can mostly be explained by retest effects. However, we observed a significant interaction effect between group and time, (1.6, 81.9) = 3.64,  = 0.04,  = 0.07, with higher increases in the first session in case physical endurance exercise was performed compared to motor imagery exercise, (51) = -2.71,  = 0.09,  = 0.75. This might suggest that the release of signaling factors due to muscle contractions with sensory feedback processing is an additional mediating mechanism alongside motor-related transient hypofrontality that improves cognitive performance.

References
1.
Liao Y, Shonkoff E, Dunton G . The Acute Relationships Between Affect, Physical Feeling States, and Physical Activity in Daily Life: A Review of Current Evidence. Front Psychol. 2016; 6:1975. PMC: 4688389. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01975. View

2.
Lotze M, Montoya P, Erb M, Hulsmann E, Flor H, Klose U . Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999; 11(5):491-501. DOI: 10.1162/089892999563553. View

3.
Kramer A . An Overview of the Beneficial Effects of Exercise on Health and Performance. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020; 1228:3-22. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1792-1_1. View

4.
Ainsworth B, Cahalin L, Buman M, Ross R . The current state of physical activity assessment tools. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014; 57(4):387-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.10.005. View

5.
Roberts R, Callow N, Hardy L, Markland D, Bringer J . Movement imagery ability: development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2008; 30(2):200-21. DOI: 10.1123/jsep.30.2.200. View