» Articles » PMID: 36106599

Image Distortion During Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Laboratory Model Comparing Super Pulsed Thulium Fiber Laser High-Power Ho:YAG Laser

Overview
Journal J Endourol
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2022 Sep 15
PMID 36106599
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Digital ureteroscopes employ "chip-on-the-tip" technology that allows for significant improvement in image resolution. However, image distortion often occurs during laser lithotripsy owing to acoustic wave production. We sought to compare image distortion using different laser power settings and distances from the laser fiber tip to the scope for the Super Pulsed Thulium Fiber (SPTF) laser and high-power Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser. Ureteroscopy was simulated using a silicon kidney-ureter-bladder model fitted with a 12F/14F access sheath and the Lithovue™ (Boston Scientific), disposable digital flexible ureteroscope. At defined laser parameters (10, 20, 30 and 40 W, short pulse), a 200-μm laser fiber was slowly retracted toward the tip of the ureteroscope during laser activation. Image distortion was identified, and distance from the laser tip to the scope tip was determined. Data from the two lasers were compared utilizing -tests. After controlling for frequency, power, and laser mode, utilizing 1.0 J of energy was significantly associated with less feedback than 0.5 J (-0.091 mm,  ≤ 0.05). Increased power was associated with larger feedback distance (0.016 mm,  ≤ 0.05); however, increase in frequency did not have a significant effect (-0.001 mm,  = 0.39). The SPFT laser had significantly less feedback when compared with all Holmium laser modes. Increased total power results in image distortion occurring at greater distances from the tip of the ureteroscope during laser activation. Image distortion occurs further from the ureteroscope with Ho:YAG laser than with SPTF fibers at the same laser settings. In clinical practice, the tip of the laser fiber should be kept further away from the tip of the scope during ureteroscopy as the power increases as well as when utilizing the Ho:YAG system compared with the SPTF laser platform. The SPTF laser may have a better safety profile in terms of potential scope damage.

Citing Articles

Illumination matters part I: comparative analysis of light sources and illumination in flexible ureteroscopy-fundamental findings from a PEARLS analysis.

Kwok J, De Coninck V, Corrales M, Sierra A, Panthier F, Ventimiglia E World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):355.

PMID: 38796790 PMC: 11128383. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05037-7.


Navigating urolithiasis treatment: assessing the practicality and performance of thulium fiber laser, holmium YAG, and thulium YAG in real-world scenarios.

Solano C, Corrales M, Panthier F, Candela L, Doizi S, Traxer O World J Urol. 2023; 41(10):2627-2636.

PMID: 37468656 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04487-9.


Laser Efficiency and Laser Safety: Holmium YAG vs. Thulium Fiber Laser.

Sierra A, Corrales M, Somani B, Traxer O J Clin Med. 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36614950 PMC: 9821183. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010149.

References
1.
Molina W, Carrera R, Chew B, Knudsen B . Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG). World J Urol. 2021; 39(10):3951-3956. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03619-3. View

2.
Dragos L, Somani B, Keller E, De Coninck V, Herrero M, Kamphuis G . Characteristics of current digital single-use flexible ureteroscopes versus their reusable counterparts: an comparative analysis. Transl Androl Urol. 2019; 8(Suppl 4):S359-S370. PMC: 6790413. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.17. View

3.
Marshall V . FIBER OPTICS IN UROLOGY. J Urol. 1964; 91:110-4. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)64066-7. View

4.
Andreeva V, Vinarov A, Yaroslavsky I, Kovalenko A, Vybornov A, Rapoport L . Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. World J Urol. 2019; 38(2):497-503. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02785-9. View

5.
Keller E, Traxer O . SuperPulsed Thulium fiber laser: The ultimate laser for lithotripsy?. Arch Esp Urol. 2020; 73(8):767-776. View