Molecular Tumor Board-Assisted Care in an Advanced Cancer Population: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs) interpret next-generation sequencing reports and help oncologists determine best therapeutic options; however, there is a paucity of data regarding their clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to determine if MTB-directed therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) over immediately prior therapy in patients with advanced cancer.
Methods: This single-arm, prospective phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced cancer with an actionable mutation who received MTB-recommended targeted therapy between January 1, 2017, and October 31, 2020. MTB-recommended both on-label (level 1 evidence) and off-label (evidence levels 2 and 3) therapies. Of the 93 enrolled patients, 43 were treated frontline and 50 received second-line or greater-line therapy. The primary outcome was the probability of patients treated with second-line or greater-line MTB-directed therapy who achieved a PFS ratio ≥ 1.3 (PFS on MTB-directed therapy divided by PFS on the patient's immediately prior therapy). Secondary outcomes included PFS for patients treated frontline and overall survival and adverse effects for the entire study population.
Results: The most common disease sites were lung (35 of 93, 38%), gynecologic (17 of 93, 18%), GI (16 of 93, 17%), and head and neck (7 of 93, 8%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of PFS ratio ≥ 1.3 was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.75) for patients treated with second-line or greater-line MTB-directed therapy. The median PFS was 449 (range 42-1,125) days for patients treated frontline. The median overall survival was 768 (range 22-1,240) days. There were four nontreatment-related deaths.
Conclusion: When treated with MTB-directed therapy, most patients experienced improved PFS compared with immediately prior treatment. MTB-directed targeted therapy may be a strategy to improve outcomes for patients with advanced cancer.
Unveiling the Digital Evolution of Molecular Tumor Boards.
Lutz S, DAngelo A, Hammerl S, Schmutz M, Claus R, Fischer N Target Oncol. 2024; 20(1):27-43.
PMID: 39609355 PMC: 11762447. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01109-1.
Rives T, Collard J, Li N, Yan D, Dietrich C, Miller R JCO Precis Oncol. 2024; 8:e2400301.
PMID: 39259913 PMC: 11404756. DOI: 10.1200/PO.24.00301.
Evolving and Improving the Sustainability of Molecular Tumor Boards: The Value and Challenges.
Bartels M, Chibaudel B, Dienstmann R, Lehtio J, Piccolo A, Michielin O Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(16).
PMID: 39199658 PMC: 11353190. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162888.
Concordance in Molecular Tumor Board Case Reviews in the ASCO TAPUR Study.
Perez J, Kleber J, Rothe M, Mangat P, Garrett-Mayer E, Schilsky R JCO Precis Oncol. 2024; 8:e2300615.
PMID: 38564684 PMC: 11000764. DOI: 10.1200/PO.23.00615.
Hutchcraft M, Zhang S, Lin N, Pickarski J, Belcher E, Wei S JCO Precis Oncol. 2024; 8:e2300266.
PMID: 38295319 PMC: 10843325. DOI: 10.1200/PO.23.00266.