» Articles » PMID: 36097039

Capturing, Clarifying, and Consolidating the Curiosity-creativity Connection

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Sep 12
PMID 36097039
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cognitive-motivational concepts of curiosity and creativity are often viewed as intertwined. Yet, despite the intuitively strong linkage between these two concepts, the existing cognitive-behavioral evidence for a curiosity-creativity connection is not strong, and is nearly entirely based on self-report measures. Using a new lab-based Curiosity Q&A task we evaluate to what extent behaviorally manifested curiosity-as revealed in autonomous inquiry and exploration-is associated with creative performance. In a preregistered study (N = 179) we show that, as hypothesized, the novelty of the questions that participants generated during the Curiosity Q&A Task significantly positively correlated with the originality of their responses on a divergent-thinking task (the conceptually-based Alternative Uses Task). Additionally, the extent to which participants sought out information that was implicitly missing in the presented factual stimuli ("gap-related information foraging") positively correlated with performance on two predominantly convergent-thinking tasks (the Remote Associates Task and Analogy Completion). Question asking, topic-related information foraging, and creative performance correlated with trait-based "interest-type" curiosity oriented toward exploration and novelty, but not with "deprivation-type" curiosity focused on dispelling uncertainty or ignorance. Theoretically and practically, these results underscore the importance of continuing to develop interventions that foster both creative thinking and active autonomous inquiry.

Citing Articles

Validation of the I- and D-type epistemic curiosity scale among young Chinese children and implications on early curiosity nurture.

Tang S, Xu T, Jin L, Ji L, Chen Q, Qiu J BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):795.

PMID: 39736646 PMC: 11684292. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-02286-4.


Creative minds at rest: Creative individuals are more associative and engaged with their idle thoughts.

Raffaelli Q, Malusa R, de Stefano N, Andrews E, Grilli M, Mills C Creat Res J. 2024; 36(3):396-412.

PMID: 39132452 PMC: 11315452. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2227477.


Exploratory preferences explain the human fascination for imaginary worlds in fictional stories.

Dubourg E, Thouzeau V, de Dampierre C, Mogoutov A, Baumard N Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8657.

PMID: 37246187 PMC: 10225465. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35151-2.

References
1.
Wu Y, Koutstaal W . Charting the contributions of cognitive flexibility to creativity: Self-guided transitions as a process-based index of creativity-related adaptivity. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6):e0234473. PMC: 7292033. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234473. View

2.
Bowden E, Jung-Beeman M . Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004; 35(4):634-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03195543. View

3.
Wen M, Butler L, Koutstaal W . Improving insight and non-insight problem solving with brief interventions. Br J Psychol. 2013; 104(1):97-118. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02107.x. View

4.
Christensen A, Cotter K, Silvia P . Reopening Openness to Experience: A Network Analysis of Four Openness to Experience Inventories. J Pers Assess. 2018; 101(6):574-588. DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1467428. View

5.
Erwin A, Tran K, Koutstaal W . Evaluating the predictive validity of four divergent thinking tasks for the originality of design product ideation. PLoS One. 2022; 17(3):e0265116. PMC: 8920217. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265116. View