#Ophthalmology: Social Media Utilization and Impact in Ophthalmology Journals, Professional Societies, and Eye Health Organizations

Overview

Journal Clin Ophthalmol

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2022 Sep 12

PMID 36092462

Authors

Samuel A Cohen

Suzann Pershing

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and quantify social media presence of ophthalmology peer-reviewed journals, professional societies, and eye health organizations, and to determine if there is a correlation between social media utilization and Twitter engagement metrics or journal impact measures.

Methods: We searched for online profiles of 100 ophthalmology peer-reviewed journals, 333 professional ophthalmology societies, and 40 eye health organizations on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Impact was quantified by recording the number of "likes" on Facebook and number of followers on Twitter and Instagram. We also used Twitonomy software to obtain advanced Twitter metrics for all journal accounts from 2018 to 2021, and compared to journal impact measured by SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) score, the h-index, and impact factor.

Results: Eye health organizations averaged significantly greater Facebooks "likes" and Twitter followers than both peer-reviewed journals and professional societies (p < 0.0001). Of 100 journals studied, 30% were active on Twitter, 25% on Facebook, and 6% on Instagram. Slightly more than half of all journal-affiliated social media accounts were accessible from the journal website. Among journals with active Twitter accounts, total followers, total tweets, average retweets, and average "favorites" were all significantly positively correlated with academic metrics such as the SJR, h-index, and/or impact factor.

Conclusion: Greater social media engagement is associated with higher ophthalmology journal impact metrics; however, ophthalmology journals and professional societies lag behind eye health organizations in social media engagement. Although unable to demonstrate causality, social media may be an underutilized visibility, communication, and dissemination tool.

Citing Articles

A role for qualitative methods in researching Twitter data on a popular science article's communication.

Noakes T, Uys C, Harpur P, van Zyl I Front Res Metr Anal. 2025; 9():1431298.

PMID: 39839196 PMC: 11747522. DOI: 10.3389/frma.2024.1431298.

Tweeting for Success: The Role of Twitter in Enhancing SCImago Journal Rank for Specialty Surgical Journals.

Patel H, Camacho J, Pandit S, Morey G, Sharma D, Karon M Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40867.

PMID: 37489198 PMC: 10363403. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40867.

Association Between Twitter Mention and Open-Access Status on Article Citation Metrics in the Field of Ophthalmology.

Santos D, Asif N, Santos Malave G, Izquierdo N Cureus. 2022; 14(11):e31048.

PMID: 36349069 PMC: 9631347. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31048.

References

Woitowich N, Arora V, Pendergrast T, Gottlieb M, Trueger N, Jain S . Gender Differences in Physician Use of Social Media for Professional Advancement. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(5):e219834. PMC: 8120326. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9834. View

Hazzam J, Lahrech A . Health Care Professionals' Social Media Behavior and the Underlying Factors of Social Media Adoption and Use: Quantitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(11):e12035. PMC: 6249501. DOI: 10.2196/12035. View

Wong K, Piraquive J, Levi J . Social media presence of otolaryngology journals: The past, present, and future. Laryngoscope. 2017; 128(2):363-368. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26727. View

Rivas J, Socarras M, Tortolero Blanco L . Social Media in Urology: opportunities, applications, appropriate use and new horizons. Cent European J Urol. 2016; 69(3):293-298. PMC: 5057055. DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2016.848. View

Hughes H, Hughes A, Murphy C . The Use of Twitter by the Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Journals: Twitter Activity, Impact Factor, and Alternative Metrics. Cureus. 2018; 9(12):e1931. PMC: 5807027. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1931. View

Hirsch J . An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(46):16569-72. PMC: 1283832. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102. View

Suarez-Lledo V, Alvarez-Galvez J . Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(1):e17187. PMC: 7857950. DOI: 10.2196/17187. View

Erskine N, Hendricks S . The Use of Twitter by Medical Journals: Systematic Review of the Literature. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(7):e26378. PMC: 8367184. DOI: 10.2196/26378. View

Alotaibi N, Guha D, Fallah A, Aldakkan A, Nassiri F, Badhiwala J . Social Media Metrics and Bibliometric Profiles of Neurosurgical Departments and Journals: Is There a Relationship?. World Neurosurg. 2016; 90:574-579.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.087. View

10.

Daneshjou R, Adamson A . Twitter Journal Clubs: Medical Education in the Era of Social Media. JAMA Dermatol. 2020; 156(7):729-730. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0315. View

11.

Micieli J, Tsui E . Ophthalmology on social networking sites: an observational study of Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015; 9:285-90. PMC: 4334327. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S79032. View

12.

Arigo D, Pagoto S, Carter-Harris L, Lillie S, Nebeker C . Using social media for health research: Methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery. Digit Health. 2018; 4:2055207618771757. PMC: 6016568. DOI: 10.1177/2055207618771757. View

13.

Trueger N, Bokarius A, Carroll S, April M, Thoma B . Impact of a Physician-Led Social Media Sharing Program on a Medical Journal's Web Traffic. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 15(1 Pt B):184-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.035. View

14.

Tsui E, Rao R . Navigating Social Media in #Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2019; 126(6):779-782. PMC: 9351268. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.02.015. View

15.

Gatewood J, Monks S, Singletary C, Vidrascu E, Moore J . Social Media in Public Health: Strategies to Distill, Package, and Disseminate Public Health Research. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020; 26(5):489-492. PMC: 7410266. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001096. View

16.

Ramezani-Pakpour-Langeroudi F, Okhovati M, Talebian A . Do highly cited clinicians get more citations when being present at social networking sites?. J Educ Health Promot. 2018; 7:18. PMC: 5852979. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_69_17. View

17.

Stellefson M, Paige S, Chaney B, Chaney J . Evolving Role of Social Media in Health Promotion: Updated Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(4). PMC: 7068576. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041153. View

18.

Duymus T, Karadeniz H, Sukur E, Atic R, Zehir S, Azboy I . Social media and Internet usage of orthopaedic surgeons. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017; 8(1):25-30. PMC: 5359517. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.10.007. View

19.

Cavallo D, Tate D, Ries A, Brown J, DeVellis R, Ammerman A . A social media-based physical activity intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(5):527-32. PMC: 3479432. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.019. View

20.

Asyyed Z, McGuire C, Samargandi O, Al-Youha S, Williams J . The Use of Twitter by Plastic Surgery Journals. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143(5):1092e-1098e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005535. View