» Articles » PMID: 36092012

Nine Best Practices for Research Software Registries and Repositories

Overview
Date 2022 Sep 12
PMID 36092012
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Scientific software registries and repositories improve software findability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods in a wide range of disciplines. Registries and repositories play a critical role by supporting research reproducibility and replicability, but developing them takes effort and few guidelines are available to help prospective creators of these resources. To address this need, the FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation Working Group convened a Task Force to distill the experiences of the managers of existing resources in setting expectations for all stakeholders. In this article, we describe the resultant best practices which include defining the scope, policies, and rules that govern individual registries and repositories, along with the background, examples, and collaborative work that went into their development. We believe that establishing specific policies such as those presented here will help other scientific software registries and repositories better serve their users and their disciplines.

Citing Articles

ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research.

van Kampen A, Mahamune U, Jongejan A, van Schaik B, Balashova D, Lashgari D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8117.

PMID: 39284801 PMC: 11405857. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52446-8.


Special issue on software citation, indexing, and discoverability.

Katz D, Chue Hong N PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024; 10:e1951.

PMID: 38660149 PMC: 11042024. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1951.


Where is all the research software? An analysis of software in UK academic repositories.

Carlin D, Rainer A, Wilson D PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023; 9:e1546.

PMID: 38077535 PMC: 10702715. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1546.

References
1.
Ison J, Ienasescu H, Chmura P, Rydza E, Menager H, Kalas M . The bio.tools registry of software tools and data resources for the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2019; 20(1):164. PMC: 6691543. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1772-6. View

2.
. Giving software its due. Nat Methods. 2019; 16(3):207. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0350-x. View

3.
Morin A, Urban J, Adams P, Foster I, Sali A, Baker D . Research priorities. Shining light into black boxes. Science. 2012; 336(6078):159-60. PMC: 4203337. DOI: 10.1126/science.1218263. View

4.
Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

5.
Veretnik S, Fink J, Bourne P . Computational biology resources lack persistence and usability. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008; 4(7):e1000136. PMC: 2443418. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000136. View