» Articles » PMID: 36087425

Breast Dosimetry in Alternative X-ray-based Imaging Modalities Used in Current Clinical Practices

Overview
Journal Eur J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Sep 10
PMID 36087425
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In X-ray breast imaging, Digital Mammography (DM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), are the standard and largely used techniques, both for diagnostic and screening purposes. Other techniques, such as dedicated Breast Computed Tomography (BCT) and Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM) have been developed as an alternative or a complementary technique to the established ones. The performance of these imaging techniques is being continuously assessed to improve the image quality and to reduce the radiation dose. These imaging modalities are predominantly used in the diagnostic setting to resolve incomplete or indeterminate findings detected with conventional screening examinations and could potentially be used either as an adjunct or as a primary screening tool in select populations, such as for women with dense breasts. The aim of this review is to describe the radiation dosimetry for these imaging techniques, and to compare the mean glandular dose with standard breast imaging modalities, such as DM and DBT.

Citing Articles

Serum Direct Bilirubin as a Biomarker for Breast Cancer.

Hu J, Cai Y, Chen Y, Zhu X Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024; 16:735-743.

PMID: 39530054 PMC: 11552383. DOI: 10.2147/BCTT.S491523.


Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast CT: Reproducibility of Volumetric Glandular Fraction with Advanced Image Reconstruction Methods.

Vedantham S, Tseng H, Fu Z, Chow H Tomography. 2023; 9(6):2039-2051.

PMID: 37987346 PMC: 10661286. DOI: 10.3390/tomography9060160.

References
1.
OConnell A, Karellas A, Vedantham S . The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples. Breast J. 2014; 20(6):592-605. PMC: 4201870. DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12327. View

2.
Dietzel M, Baltzer P, Schon K, Kaiser W . MR-mammography: high sensitivity but low specificity? New thoughts and fresh data on an old mantra. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81 Suppl 1:S30-2. DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(12)70012-8. View

3.
Hendrick R . Radiation Doses and Risks in Breast Screening. J Breast Imaging. 2024; 2(3):188-200. DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa016. View

4.
Chang C, Sibala J, Fritz S, Dwyer 3rd S, Templeton A, Lin F . Computed tomography in detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Cancer. 1980; 46(4 Suppl):939-46. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800815)46:4+<939::aid-cncr2820461315>3.0.co;2-l. View

5.
Burgess A, Jacobson F, Judy P . Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys. 2001; 28(4):419-37. DOI: 10.1118/1.1355308. View