» Articles » PMID: 36085376

The Value of CT Features and Demographic Data in the Differential Diagnosis of Type 2 Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma from Fat-poor Angiomyolipoma and Oncocytoma

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Sep 10
PMID 36085376
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purposes: To determine the CT features and demographic data predictive of type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) that can help distinguish this neoplasm from fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML) and oncocytoma.

Methods: Fifty-four patients with type 2 PRCC, 48 with fpAML, and 47 with oncocytoma in the kidney from multiple centers were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic data and CT features of type 2 PRCC were analyzed and compared with those of fpAML and oncocytoma by univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the predictive factors for differential diagnosis. Then, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to further assess the logistic regression model and set the threshold level values of the numerical parameters.

Results: Older age (≥ 46.5 years), unenhanced lesion-to-renal cortex attenuation (RLRCA) < 1.21, corticomedullary ratio of lesion to renal cortex net enhancement (RLRCNE) < 0.32, and size ≥ 30.1 mm were independent predictors for distinguishing type 2 PRCC from fpAML (OR 14.155, 8.332, and 57.745, respectively, P < 0.05 for all). The area under the curve (AUC) of the multiple logistic regression model in the ROC curve analysis was 0.970. In the combined evaluation, the four independent predictors had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.896 and 0.889, respectively. A corticomedullary RLRCNE < 0.61, irregular shape, and male sex were independent predictors for the differential diagnosis of type 2 PRCC from oncocytoma (OR 15.714, 12.158, and 6.175, respectively, P < 0.05 for all). In the combined evaluation, the three independent predictors had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.889 and 0.979, respectively. The AUC of the multiple logistic regression model in the ROC curve analysis was 0.964.

Conclusion: The combined application of CT features and demographic data had good ability in distinguishing type 2 PRCC from fpAML and oncocytoma, respectively.

References
1.
Warren A, Harrison D . WHO/ISUP classification, grading and pathological staging of renal cell carcinoma: standards and controversies. World J Urol. 2018; 36(12):1913-1926. PMC: 6280811. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2447-8. View

2.
Young J, Margolis D, Sauk S, Pantuck A, Sayre J, Raman S . Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: discrimination from other renal cell carcinoma subtypes and oncocytoma at multiphasic multidetector CT. Radiology. 2013; 267(2):444-53. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13112617. View

3.
Kim S, Kim C, Kim M, Cho J, Cho S . Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes and Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma by Use of Quantitative Enhancement Measurement During Three-Phase MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 206(1):W21-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.14666. View

4.
Lee-Felker S, Felker E, Tan N, Margolis D, Young J, Sayre J . Qualitative and quantitative MDCT features for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from other solid renal cortical masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203(5):W516-24. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.12460. View

5.
Bird V, Kanagarajah P, Morillo G, Caruso D, Ayyathurai R, Leveillee R . Differentiation of oncocytoma and renal cell carcinoma in small renal masses (<4 cm): the role of 4-phase computerized tomography. World J Urol. 2010; 29(6):787-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0586-7. View