» Articles » PMID: 36082303

Antinutritional Factors, Nutritional Improvement, and Future Food Use of Common Beans: A Perspective

Abstract

Common bean seeds are an excellent source of protein as well as of carbohydrates, minerals, vitamins, and bioactive compounds reducing, when in the diet, the risks of diseases. The presence of bioactive compounds with antinutritional properties (e.g., phytic acid, lectins, raffinosaccharides, protease inhibitors) limits, however, the bean's nutritional value and its wider use in food preparations. In the last decades, concerted efforts have been, therefore, made to develop new common bean genotypes with reduced antinutritional compounds by exploiting the natural genetic variability of common bean and also applying induced mutagenesis. However, possible negative, or positive, pleiotropic effects due to these modifications, in terms of plant performance in response to stresses or in the resulting technological properties of the developed mutant genotypes, have yet not been thoroughly investigated. The purpose of the perspective paper is to first highlight the current advances, which have been already made in mutant bean characterization. A view will be further provided on future research directions to specifically explore further advantages and disadvantages of these bean mutants, their potential use in innovative foods and representing a valuable genetic reservoir of combinations to assess the true functional role of specific seed bioactive components directly in the food matrix.

Citing Articles

Improving the antinutritional profiles of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) moderately impacts carotenoid bioaccessibility but not mineral solubility.

Alvarado-Ramos K, Bravo-Nunez A, Halimi C, Maillot M, Icard-Verniere C, Forti C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11908.

PMID: 38789472 PMC: 11126681. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61475-8.


Legumes and common beans in sustainable diets: nutritional quality, environmental benefits, spread and use in food preparations.

Lisciani S, Marconi S, Donne C, Camilli E, Aguzzi A, Gabrielli P Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1385232.

PMID: 38769988 PMC: 11104268. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1385232.


Efficient Anthocyanin Recovery from Black Bean Hulls Using Eutectic Mixtures: A Sustainable Approach for Natural Dye Development.

Kuasnei M, Benvenutti L, Dos Santos D, Ferreira S, Pinto V, Zielinski A Foods. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731745 PMC: 11083087. DOI: 10.3390/foods13091374.


Plant Toxic Proteins: Their Biological Activities, Mechanism of Action and Removal Strategies.

Kocyigit E, Kocaadam-Bozkurt B, Bozkurt O, Agagunduz D, Capasso R Toxins (Basel). 2023; 15(6).

PMID: 37368657 PMC: 10303728. DOI: 10.3390/toxins15060356.

References
1.
Pandurangan S, Sandercock M, Beyaert R, Conn K, Hou A, Marsolais F . Differential response to sulfur nutrition of two common bean genotypes differing in storage protein composition. Front Plant Sci. 2015; 6:92. PMC: 4335288. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00092. View

2.
Geraldo R, Santos C, Pinto E, Vasconcelos M . Widening the Perspectives for Legume Consumption: The Case of Bioactive Non-nutrients. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:772054. PMC: 8866194. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.772054. View

3.
Hayat I, Ahmad A, Masud T, Ahmed A, Bashir S . Nutritional and health perspectives of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): an overview. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013; 54(5):580-92. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2011.596639. View

4.
Henchion M, Hayes M, Mullen A, Fenelon M, Tiwari B . Future Protein Supply and Demand: Strategies and Factors Influencing a Sustainable Equilibrium. Foods. 2017; 6(7). PMC: 5532560. DOI: 10.3390/foods6070053. View

5.
Hart J, Tako E, Glahn R . Characterization of Polyphenol Effects on Inhibition and Promotion of Iron Uptake by Caco-2 Cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2017; 65(16):3285-3294. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05755. View