» Articles » PMID: 36081836

Global Sensitivity Analysis of Leaf-Canopy-Atmosphere RTMs: Implications for Biophysical Variables Retrieval from Top-of-Atmosphere Radiance Data

Overview
Date 2022 Sep 9
PMID 36081836
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Knowledge of key variables driving the top of the atmosphere (TOA) radiance over a vegetated surface is an important step to derive biophysical variables from TOA radiance data, e.g., as observed by an optical satellite. Coupled leaf-canopy-atmosphere Radiative Transfer Models (RTMs) allow linking vegetation variables directly to the at-sensor TOA radiance measured. Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) of RTMs enables the computation of the total contribution of each input variable to the output variance. We determined the impacts of the leaf-canopy-atmosphere variables into TOA radiance using the GSA to gain insights into retrievable variables. The leaf and canopy RTM PROSAIL was coupled with the atmospheric RTM MODTRAN5. Because of MODTRAN's computational burden and GSA's demand for many simulations, we first developed a surrogate statistical learning model, i.e., an emulator, that allows approximating RTM outputs through a machine learning algorithm with low computation time. A Gaussian process regression (GPR) emulator was used to reproduce lookup tables of TOA radiance as a function of 12 input variables with relative errors of 2.4%. GSA total sensitivity results quantified the driving variables of emulated TOA radiance along the 400-2500 nm spectral range at 15 cm (between 0.3-9 nm); overall, the vegetation variables play a more dominant role than atmospheric variables. This suggests the possibility to retrieve biophysical variables directly from at-sensor TOA radiance data. Particularly promising are leaf chlorophyll content, leaf water thickness and leaf area index, as these variables are the most important drivers in governing TOA radiance outside the water absorption regions. A software framework was developed to facilitate the development of retrieval models from at-sensor TOA radiance data. As a proof of concept, maps of these biophysical variables have been generated for both TOA (L1C) and bottom-of-atmosphere (L2A) Sentinel-2 data by means of a hybrid retrieval scheme, i.e., training GPR retrieval algorithms using the RTM simulations. Obtained maps from L1C vs L2A data are consistent, suggesting that vegetation properties can be directly retrieved from TOA radiance data given a cloud-free sky, thus without the need of an atmospheric correction.

Citing Articles

Remote sensing reveals the role of forage quality and quantity for summer habitat use in red deer.

Rempfler T, Rossi C, Schweizer J, Peters W, Signer C, Filli F Mov Ecol. 2024; 12(1):80.

PMID: 39696538 PMC: 11654361. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-024-00521-6.


Estimating the phenological dynamics of irrigated rice leaf area index using the combination of PROSAIL and Gaussian Process Regression.

Adeluyi O, Harris A, Verrelst J, Foster T, Claya G Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2022; 102:102454.

PMID: 36092369 PMC: 7613347. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102454.


Multi-sensor spectral synergies for crop stress detection and monitoring in the optical domain: A review.

Berger K, Machwitz M, Kycko M, Kefauver S, Van Wittenberghe S, Gerhards M Remote Sens Environ. 2022; 280:113198.

PMID: 36090616 PMC: 7613382. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113198.


Retrieval of aboveground crop nitrogen content with a hybrid machine learning method.

Berger K, Verrelst J, Feret J, Hank T, Wocher M, Mauser W Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2022; 92:102174.

PMID: 36090128 PMC: 7613569. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102174.


Crop Nitrogen Retrieval Methods for Simulated Sentinel-2 Data Using In-Field Spectrometer Data.

Perich G, Aasen H, Verrelst J, Argento F, Walter A, Liebisch F Remote Sens (Basel). 2022; 13(12):2404.

PMID: 36082363 PMC: 7613346. DOI: 10.3390/rs13122404.


References
1.
Stamnes K, Tsay S, Wiscombe W, Jayaweera K . Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. Appl Opt. 2010; 27(12):2502-9. DOI: 10.1364/AO.27.002502. View

2.
Curran P, Dungan J, Gholz H . Exploring the relationship between reflectance red edge and chlorophyll content in slash pine. Tree Physiol. 1990; 7(1_2_3_4):33-48. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/7.1-2-3-4.33. View

3.
Kotchenova S, Vermote E, Levy R, Lyapustin A . Radiative transfer codes for atmospheric correction and aerosol retrieval: intercomparison study. Appl Opt. 2008; 47(13):2215-26. DOI: 10.1364/ao.47.002215. View

4.
Liu X, Smith W, Zhou D, Larar A . Principal component-based radiative transfer model for hyperspectral sensors: theoretical concept. Appl Opt. 2006; 45(1):201-9. DOI: 10.1364/ao.45.000201. View

5.
Vicent J, Verrelst J, Rivera-Caicedo J, Sabater N, Munoz-Mari J, Camps-Valls G . Emulation as an Accurate Alternative to Interpolation in Sampling Radiative Transfer Codes. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 2022; 11(12):4918-4931. PMC: 7613334. DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2018.2875330. View