Elbow Hemiarthroplasty Vs. Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Acute Arbeitsgemeinschaft Für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) Type 13C Fractures-A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal JSES Int

Date 2022 Sep 9

PMID 36081704

Authors

Andreas F Nielsen

Ali Al-Hamdani

Jeppe V Rasmussen

Bo S Olsen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the standard treatment for multifragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fractures. Fractures not amenable by ORIF are treated with total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). In recent years, elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) has been used as an alternative to TEA, as weight bearing restrictions and risk of component loosening are lower. We systematically reviewed the literature reporting functional outcomes and complication rates after either EHA or ORIF for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were at least 5 patients, aged ≥50 years, AO/OTA type 13C fracture treated with ORIF or EHA, and evaluation with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Literature screening and data extraction were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The results were synthesized qualitatively using weighted means. No comparative statistical analyses were done.

Results: We included 27 articles, which included 96 patients treated with EHA and 535 patients treated with ORIF. We identified 1 randomized controlled trial and 26 case series. The weighted mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 86.9 (n = 89) in the EHA group and 84.7 (n = 535) in the ORIF group. There were 26 (33%) complications (n = 78) in the EHA group and 103 (38%) complications (n = 270) in the ORIF group. Complication rates were generally high in both groups.

Conclusion: We found comparable results of EHA and ORIF, which indicate that EHA is a viable treatment option for AO/OTA type 13C fractures not amenable by ORIF. Because of high risk of bias, interpretation of the results should be done with caution.

Citing Articles

The age specific performance of elbow hemiarthroplasty: A systematic review.

Heifner J, Falgiano P, Yergler T, Davis T, Hoekzema N, Orbay J Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241246756.

PMID: 39552692 PMC: 11562450. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241246756.

Outcomes at mean follow-up of four years following AO type-C distal humerus fractures managed with fixation or arthroplasty.

Allen J, Budworth L, Cowling P, Tunstall C, Limb D, Vollans S Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241283909.

PMID: 39545001 PMC: 11559901. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241283909.

The Copenhagen Classification System for Distal Humeral Fractures is useful to identify patients who may require treatment with hemi- or total elbow arthroplasty.

Al-Hamdani A, Rasmussen J, Al-Hamdani M, Sorensen A, Eschen J, Olsen B JSES Int. 2024; 8(4):915-920.

PMID: 39035674 PMC: 11258849. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.016.

Commentary.

Antuna S Shoulder Elbow. 2023; 15(1):93.

PMID: 36895613 PMC: 9990096. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231152535.

References

Phadnis J, Watts A, Bain G . Elbow hemiarthroplasty for the management of distal humeral fractures: current technique, indications and results. Shoulder Elbow. 2016; 8(3):171-83. PMC: 4950283. DOI: 10.1177/1758573216640210. View

Pidhorz L, Alligand-Perrin P, De Keating E, Fabre T, Mansat P . Distal humerus fracture in the elderly: does conservative treatment still have a role?. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(8):903-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.10.001. View

Luegmair M, Timofiev E, Chirpaz-Cerbat J . Surgical treatment of AO type C distal humeral fractures: internal fixation with a Y-shaped reconstruction (Lambda) plate. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 17(1):113-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.007. View

Shannon S, Wagner E, Houdek M, Mascarenhas D, Pensy R, Eglseder W . Osteosynthesis of AO/OTA 13-C3 distal humeral fractures in patients older than 70 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 27(2):291-297. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.012. View

Celli A, Donini M, Minervini C . The use of pre-contoured plates in the treatment of C2-C3 fractures of the distal humerus: clinical experience. Chir Organi Mov. 2008; 91(2):57-64. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-007-0022-3. View

Longo U, Franceschi F, Loppini M, Maffulli N, Denaro V . Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow. Br Med Bull. 2008; 87:131-61. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldn023. View

Al-Hamdani A, Rasmussen J, Sorensen A, Ovesen J, Holtz K, Brorson S . Good outcome after elbow hemiarthroplasty in active patients with an acute intra-articular distal humeral fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019; 28(5):925-930. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.018. View

Iwamoto T, Suzuki T, Matsumura N, Nakamura M, Matsumoto M, Sato K . Lateral Para-Olecranon Approach for the Treatment of Distal Humeral Fracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42(5):344-350. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.02.004. View

Serrano-Mateo L, Lopiz Y, Leon-Serrano C, Garcia-Fernandez C, Lopez-Duran-Stern L, Marco F . [Results after internal fixation of humerus distal fractures in patients over than 65 years old]. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2013; 58(1):31-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2013.09.008. View

10.

Huang T, Chiu F, Chuang T, Chen T . The results of open reduction and internal fixation in elderly patients with severe fractures of the distal humerus: a critical analysis of the results. J Trauma. 2005; 58(1):62-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000154058.20429.9c. View

11.

Phadnis J, Banerjee S, Watts A, Little N, Hearnden A, Patel V . Elbow hemiarthroplasty using a "triceps-on" approach for the management of acute distal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24(8):1178-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.010. View

12.

Schoch B, Wong J, Abboud J, Lazarus M, Getz C, Ramsey M . Results of Total Elbow Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years Old. J Hand Surg Am. 2017; 42(10):797-802. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.101. View

13.

Heijink A, Wagener M, de Vos M, Eygendaal D . Distal humerus prosthetic hemiarthroplasty: midterm results. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2015; 10(2):101-8. PMC: 4570889. DOI: 10.1007/s11751-015-0229-z. View

14.

Ma L, Wang Y, Yang Z, Huang D, Weng H, Zeng X . Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?. Mil Med Res. 2020; 7(1):7. PMC: 7049186. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8. View

15.

Hohman D, Nodzo S, Qvick L, Duquin T, Paterson P . Hemiarthroplasty of the distal humerus for acute and chronic complex intra-articular injuries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 23(2):265-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.05.007. View

16.

Batten T, Sin-Hidge C, Brinsden M, Guyver P . Non-operative management of distal humerus fractures in the elderly: a review of functional outcomes. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017; 28(1):23-27. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2006-9. View

17.

Huang J, Paczas M, Hoyen H, Vallier H . Functional outcome after open reduction internal fixation of intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly. J Orthop Trauma. 2011; 25(5):259-65. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181dfd348. View

18.

Clavert P, Ducrot G, Sirveaux F, Fabre T, Mansat P . Outcomes of distal humerus fractures in patients above 65 years of age treated by plate fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013; 99(7):771-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.001. View

19.

Dunn J, Kusnezov N, Pirela-Cruz M . Distal humeral hemiarthroplasty: indications, results, and complications. A systematic review. Hand (N Y). 2014; 9(4):406-12. PMC: 4235903. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9681-3. View

20.

Ansari M, Khan N, Atif A . Management of type 13C2 distal humerus fractures by olecranon osteotomy approach versus triceps sparing approach-our experience with sixty cases. Int Orthop. 2020; 44(12):2735-2742. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04785-6. View