» Articles » PMID: 36081064

Comparing Loose Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Body-Mounted Sensors in the Analysis of Walking

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Sep 9
PMID 36081064
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A person's walking pattern can reveal important information about their health. Mounting multiple sensors onto loose clothing potentially offers a comfortable way of collecting data about walking and other human movement. This research investigates how well the data from three sensors mounted on the lateral side of clothing (on a pair of trousers near the waist, upper thigh and lower shank) correlate with the data from sensors mounted on the frontal side of the body. Data collected from three participants (two male, one female) for two days were analysed. Gait cycles were extracted based on features in the lower-shank accelerometry and analysed in terms of sensor-to-vertical angles (SVA). The correlations in SVA between the clothing- and body-mounted sensor pairs were analysed. Correlation coefficients above 0.76 were found for the waist sensor pairs, while the thigh and lower-shank sensor pairs had correlations above 0.90. The cyclical nature of gait cycles was evident in the clothing data, and it was possible to distinguish the stance and swing phases of walking based on features in the clothing data. Furthermore, simultaneously recording data from the waist, thigh, and shank was helpful in capturing the movement of the whole leg.

Citing Articles

Smartphone IMU Sensors for Human Identification through Hip Joint Angle Analysis.

Andersson R, Bermejo-Garcia J, Agujetas R, Cronhjort M, Chilo J Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(15).

PMID: 39123816 PMC: 11314747. DOI: 10.3390/s24154769.


Inertial measurement data from loose clothing worn on the lower body during everyday activities.

Jayasinghe U, Hwang F, Harwin W Sci Data. 2023; 10(1):709.

PMID: 37848448 PMC: 10582085. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02567-4.


Sensor Selection for Tidal Volume Determination via Linear Regression-Impact of Lasso versus Ridge Regression.

Laufer B, Docherty P, Murray R, Krueger-Ziolek S, Jalal N, Hoeflinger F Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(17).

PMID: 37687863 PMC: 10490437. DOI: 10.3390/s23177407.


A Probabilistic Model of Human Activity Recognition with Loose Clothing.

Shen T, Di Giulio I, Howard M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(10).

PMID: 37430582 PMC: 10220539. DOI: 10.3390/s23104669.


Characterisation and Quantification of Upper Body Surface Motions for Tidal Volume Determination in Lung-Healthy Individuals.

Laufer B, Hoeflinger F, Docherty P, Jalal N, Krueger-Ziolek S, Rupitsch S Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(3).

PMID: 36772318 PMC: 9920533. DOI: 10.3390/s23031278.

References
1.
Taraldsen K, Helbostad J, Follestad T, Bergh S, Selbaek G, Saltvedt I . Gait, physical function, and physical activity in three groups of home-dwelling older adults with different severity of cognitive impairment - a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2021; 21(1):670. PMC: 8638089. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02598-9. View

2.
Sabatini A, Martelloni C, Scapellato S, Cavallo F . Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005; 52(3):486-94. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2004.840727. View

3.
Seel T, Raisch J, Schauer T . IMU-based joint angle measurement for gait analysis. Sensors (Basel). 2014; 14(4):6891-909. PMC: 4029684. DOI: 10.3390/s140406891. View

4.
Mukaka M . Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2013; 24(3):69-71. PMC: 3576830. View

5.
Madgwick S, Harrison A, Vaidyanathan A . Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2012; 2011:5975346. DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975346. View