» Articles » PMID: 36079826

Differences in Measured and Self-Categorized Food Security Status and Related Coping Strategies Among College Students

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2022 Sep 9
PMID 36079826
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Qualitative studies suggest that college students with food insecurity (FI) experience stigma and misinterpret some of the USDA Adult Food Security Survey Module (AFSSM) questions, leading to misclassification of food security (FS) status. We aimed to evaluate differences in AFSSM-measured FS status and self-categorized FS status (based on USDA descriptions of the four FS levels) among college students, and to identify differences in the coping strategies and BMI of these students. Data were collected cross-sectionally from a convenience sample via web-based, self-reported surveys. Measured FS, self-categorized FS, coping strategies, and self-reported BMI were key variables of interest. Participants were 1003 undergraduate and graduate students (22.2 ± 4.6 years; 65.7% female). Of the participants measured as food insecure (40.0%), 57.8% self-categorized as food secure (MFI-SFS) and 42.2% self-categorized as food insecure (MFI-SFI). Significantly more MFI-SFI participants were AFSSM-categorized as having very low FS when compared to MFI-SFS participants (71.6% vs. 46.6%, p < 0.05). MFI-SFI participants reported significantly higher BMI (M = 24.7, SD ± 6.0 kg/m2) and coping strategies scores (M = 49.8, SD ± 7.5) when compared to MFI-SFS participants (M = 23.1, SD ± 3.6 kg/m2; M = 46.9, SD ± 7.5, respectively, p ≤ 0.01). Assessment of and interventions to address FI among college students should consider the potential influence of self-perception and students’ interpretation of survey questions.

Citing Articles

Food Acquisition Coping Strategies Vary Based on Food Security Among University Students.

Sklar E, Chodur G, Kemp L, Fetter D, Scherr R Curr Dev Nutr. 2025; 9(1):104529.

PMID: 39877241 PMC: 11773212. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104529.

References
1.
Kempson K, Keenan D, Sadani P, Adler A . Maintaining food sufficiency: Coping strategies identified by limited-resource individuals versus nutrition educators. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003; 35(4):179-88. DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60332-1. View

2.
El Zein A, Mathews A, House L, Shelnutt K . Why Are Hungry College Students Not Seeking Help? Predictors of and Barriers to Using an On-Campus Food Pantry. Nutrients. 2018; 10(9). PMC: 6163327. DOI: 10.3390/nu10091163. View

3.
Knol L, Robb C, McKinley E, Wood M . Very Low Food Security Status is Related to Lower Cooking Self-Efficacy and Less Frequent Food Preparation Behaviors Among College Students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018; 51(3):357-363. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.10.009. View

4.
Wolfe W, Frongillo E, Valois P . Understanding the experience of food insecurity by elders suggests ways to improve its measurement. J Nutr. 2003; 133(9):2762-9. DOI: 10.1093/jn/133.9.2762. View

5.
Nikolaus C, Ellison B, Nickols-Richardson S . Are estimates of food insecurity among college students accurate? Comparison of assessment protocols. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4):e0215161. PMC: 6481800. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215161. View