» Articles » PMID: 36079648

Effect of Plateau Pika Disturbance on Plant Aboveground Biomass of Alpine Meadows at Two Different Scales

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2022 Sep 9
PMID 36079648
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Disturbance by small burrowing herbivores often has an impact on plant aboveground biomass of grassland because it makes grasslands into a mosaic of discrete vegetated surfaces and bare soil patches. This study focuses on the plateau pika () to investigate the effect of the disturbance by a small burrowing herbivore on plant aboveground biomass through upscaling the quadrat scale to the plot scale across five sites. This study showed that the plateau pika disturbance reduced sedge biomass and increased forb biomass. In contrast, they did not affect plant community biomass, grass biomass and legume biomass at the quadrat scale across the five sites. At the plot scale, that is, when the bare soil patches with a lack of plants were considered, plateau pika disturbance induced lower aboveground biomass of the plant community, sedge and legumes, while it had no relationship with grass biomass and forb biomass. As the disturbance intensity increased, the aboveground biomass of the plant community and sedge decreased, whereas the grass biomass showed a hump-shaped trend. These results indicate that plateau pika disturbance might be not beneficial to alpine meadows given the aboveground biomass of the plant community at the plot scale. In contrast, the intermediate disturbance intensity improves the grazing quality of alpine meadows through the higher grass biomass. The findings of this study imply that the plot scale is better than the quadrat scale to investigate the influence of the disturbance by a small burrowing herbivore on the plant aboveground biomass, and that management of a small burrowing herbivore needs to consider its disturbance intensity.

Citing Articles

Consequences of plateau pika disturbance on plant-soil carbon and nitrogen in alpine meadows.

Xu X, Wang Y, Wang X, Li J, Li J, Yang D Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1362125.

PMID: 38486855 PMC: 10937580. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1362125.

References
1.
Spencer S, Cameron G, Eshelman B, Cooper L, Williams L . Influence of pocket gopher mounds on a Texas coastal prairie. Oecologia. 2017; 66(1):111-115. DOI: 10.1007/BF00378561. View

2.
Luo J, Liu X, Yang J, Liu Y, Zhou J . Variation in plant functional groups indicates land degradation on the Tibetan Plateau. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):17606. PMC: 6279773. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36028-5. View

3.
Martinez-Estevez L, Balvanera P, Pacheco J, Ceballos G . Prairie dog decline reduces the supply of ecosystem services and leads to desertification of semiarid grasslands. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e75229. PMC: 3793983. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075229. View

4.
Fahnestock J, Detling J . Bison-prairie dog-plant interactions in a North American mixed-grass prairie. Oecologia. 2017; 132(1):86-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-0930-8. View

5.
Roemer , Forrest . Prairie Dog Poisoning in Northern Great Plains:An Analysis of Programs and Policies. Environ Manage. 1996; 20(3):349-59. DOI: 10.1007/BF01203843. View