» Articles » PMID: 36079051

Functional Outcomes Following Hip Replacement in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Sep 9
PMID 36079051
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Uncertainty remains regarding the benefit of hip replacement in older adults in the context of age-related decline in physical function. This study aimed to examine the effect of hip replacement on functional outcomes and identify factors associated with clinically important improvement in physical function postoperatively in community-dwelling older adults. This cohort study was performed within the ASPREE trial, with 698 participants receiving hip replacement and 677 age- and sex-matched controls without knee or hip replacement during the trial drawn from 16,703 Australian participants aged ≥70 years. Health status (physical and mental component summary [PCS and MCS]) was assessed annually using the SF-12. Participants receiving hip replacement had significantly lower pre- and post-replacement PCS scores compared with controls (p < 0.0001). There was significant improvement in PCS score following hip replacement (mean change 4.9, 95%CI 4.0−5.7) but no change in controls (0.01, 95%CI −0.7−0.7). Following hip replacement, 46.7% of participants experienced clinically important improvement in PCS score, while 15.5% experienced worsened PCS score. Participants experiencing improved postoperative PCS score had significantly lower PCS and higher MCS scores preoperatively. The degree of preoperative physical function impairment was a significant indicator of older people most likely to benefit from hip replacement surgery.

References
1.
Hamilton D, Henderson G, Gaston P, MacDonald D, Howie C, Simpson A . Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Postgrad Med J. 2012; 88(1045):627-31. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130715. View

2.
Choi J, Geller J, Yoon R, Wang W, Macaulay W . Comparison of total hip and knee arthroplasty cohorts and short-term outcomes from a single-center joint registry. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(6):837-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.01.016. View

3.
Van Meirhaeghe J, Alarkawi D, Kowalik T, Du-Moulin W, Molnar R, Adie S . Predicting dissatisfaction following total hip arthroplasty using a Bayesian model averaging approach: Results from the Australian Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National (ACORN). ANZ J Surg. 2021; 91(9):1908-1913. DOI: 10.1111/ans.17063. View

4.
Belmont Jr P, Goodman G, Hamilton W, Waterman B, Bader J, Schoenfeld A . Morbidity and mortality in the thirty-day period following total hip arthroplasty: risk factors and incidence. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(10):2025-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.05.015. View

5.
Judge A, Javaid M, Arden N, Cushnaghan J, Reading I, Croft P . Clinical tool to identify patients who are most likely to achieve long-term improvement in physical function after total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 64(6):881-9. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21594. View