» Articles » PMID: 36078307

Machine Learning and Criminal Justice: A Systematic Review of Advanced Methodology for Recidivism Risk Prediction

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Sep 9
PMID 36078307
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent evolution in the field of data science has revealed the potential utility of machine learning (ML) applied to criminal justice. Hence, the literature focused on finding better techniques to predict criminal recidivism risk is rapidly flourishing. However, it is difficult to make a state of the art for the application of ML in recidivism prediction. In this systematic review, out of 79 studies from Scopus and PubMed online databases we selected, 12 studies that guarantee the replicability of the models across different datasets and their applicability to recidivism prediction. The different datasets and ML techniques used in each of the 12 studies have been compared using the two selected metrics. This study shows how each method applied achieves good performance, with an average score of 0.81 for ACC and 0.74 for AUC. This systematic review highlights key points that could allow criminal justice professionals to routinely exploit predictions of recidivism risk based on ML techniques. These include the presence of performance metrics, the use of transparent algorithms or explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques, as well as the high quality of input data.

Citing Articles

Beyond Discrimination: Generative AI Applications and Ethical Challenges in Forensic Psychiatry.

Tortora L Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1346059.

PMID: 38525252 PMC: 10958425. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346059.


When do drugs trigger criminal behavior? a machine learning analysis of offenders and non-offenders with schizophrenia and comorbid substance use disorder.

Bender E, Machetanz L, von Kanel R, Euler S, Kirchebner J, Gunther M Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1356843.

PMID: 38516261 PMC: 10954830. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1356843.


Editorial: Equitable digital medicine and home health care.

De Micco F, De Benedictis A, Lettieri E, Tambone V Front Public Health. 2024; 11:1251154.

PMID: 38192562 PMC: 10773581. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1251154.


Using machine learning to forecast domestic homicide via police data and super learning.

Verrey J, Ariel B, Harinam V, Dillon L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22932.

PMID: 38129649 PMC: 10739734. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50274-2.


Model Building in Forensic Psychiatry: A Machine Learning Approach to Screening Offender Patients with SSD.

Machetanz L, Huber D, Lau S, Kirchebner J Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36292198 PMC: 9600890. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102509.

References
1.
Ozkan T, Clipper S, Piquero A, Baglivio M, Wolff K . Predicting Sexual Recidivism. Sex Abuse. 2019; 32(4):375-399. DOI: 10.1177/1079063219852944. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
Bublitz C, Wolkenstein A, Jox R, Friedrich O . Legal liabilities of BCI-users: Responsibility gaps at the intersection of mind and machine?. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018; 65:101399. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.10.002. View

4.
Haarsma G, Davenport S, White D, Ormachea P, Sheena E, Eagleman D . Assessing Risk Among Correctional Community Probation Populations: Predicting Reoffense With Mobile Neurocognitive Assessment Software. Front Psychol. 2020; 10:2926. PMC: 6992536. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02926. View

5.
Scendoni R, Ribeiro I, Cingolani M, Giovagnoni A, Curzi M, Fedeli P . A new analytical cut-off point for determining 18 years of age using MRI on medial clavicular epiphysis. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2022; 54:102010. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2021.102010. View