» Articles » PMID: 36078277

Gender Differences in Associations Between Biomechanical and Psychosocial Work Exposures and Age of Withdrawal from Paid Employment Among Older Workers

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Sep 9
PMID 36078277
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Work exposures are known predictors of withdrawal from employment, but the associations between work exposures and withdrawal may vary with gender. This study evaluated gender differences in associations between biomechanical and psychosocial work exposures and age of withdrawal from paid employment among older workers in Norway.

Methods: 77,558 men and 67,773 women (born 1949-1953) were followed from age 62 until withdrawal from paid employment or end of follow-up in 2016 (up to five years follow-up). Information about eight biomechanical and seven psychosocial exposures was obtained from a gender-specific job exposure matrix. Using Cox regression, the difference in mean estimated time until withdrawal between non-exposed and exposed was calculated for each gender and work exposure separately.

Results: The largest gender difference was found for high psychological demands. Among men, the non-exposed withdrew earlier than the exposed (-3.66 months (95% CI: -4.04--3.25 months)), and contrary among women (0.71 (0.28-1.10)), resulting in a gender difference of 4.37 (3.81-4.97) months. Gender differences were also found for monotonous work (4.12 (3.51-4.69) months), hands above shoulder height (2.41 (1.76-3.10) months), and high iso-strain (2.14 (1.38-2.95) months).

Conclusions: There were observed gender differences in the associations between some biomechanical and psychosocial work exposures and mean age of withdrawal from paid employment among older workers. However, the results are likely affected by the selection of who remains in the workforce at age 62 and should be interpreted accordingly.

Citing Articles

Cohort Profile: The Nor-Work Cohort.

Hasting R, Merkus S, Undem K, Kirkeleit J, Hoff R, Gran J Int J Epidemiol. 2025; 54(2).

PMID: 40037803 PMC: 11879514. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaf019.

References
1.
de Wind A, Geuskens G, Ybema J, Blatter B, Burdorf A, Bongers P . Health, job characteristics, skills, and social and financial factors in relation to early retirement--results from a longitudinal study in the Netherlands. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013; 40(2):186-94. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3393. View

2.
Sundstrup E, Thorsen S, Rugulies R, Larsen M, Thomassen K, Andersen L . Importance of the Working Environment for Early Retirement: Prospective Cohort Study with Register Follow-Up. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(18). PMC: 8472036. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189817. View

3.
Christensen K, Feveile H, Labriola M, Lund T . The impact of psychosocial work environment factors on the risk of disability pension in Denmark. Eur J Public Health. 2008; 18(3):235-7. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm130. View

4.
Albertsen K, Lund T, Christensen K, Kristensen T, Villadsen E . Predictors of disability pension over a 10-year period for men and women. Scand J Public Health. 2007; 35(1):78-85. DOI: 10.1080/14034940600858474. View

5.
Sundstrup E, Hansen A, Mortensen E, Poulsen O, Clausen T, Rugulies R . Retrospectively assessed physical work environment during working life and risk of sickness absence and labour market exit among older workers. Occup Environ Med. 2017; 75(2):114-123. PMC: 5800344. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104279. View