» Articles » PMID: 36077981

Utility of the Ratio Between Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Activity and Total Nucleated Cell Counts in Effusions (LDH/TNCC Ratio) for the Diagnosis of Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP)

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2022 Sep 9
PMID 36077981
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We tested the hypothesis that the ratio between lactate dehydrogenase activity (LDH) and total nucleated cell counts (TNCC) in effusions may be useful to diagnose feline infectious peritonitis (FIP).

Methods: LDH/TNCC ratio was retrospectively evaluated in 648 effusions grouped based on cytology and physicochemical analysis (step 1), on the probability of FIP estimated by additional tests on fluids (step 2) or on other biological samples (step 3, = 471). Results of different steps were statistically compared. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were designed to assess whether the ratio identify the samples with FIP "probable/almost confirmed". The cut-offs with the highest positive likelihood ratio (LR+) or Youden Index (YI) or with equal sensitivity and specificity were determined.

Results: A high median LDH/TNCC ratio was found in FIP effusions (step1: 2.01) and with probable or almost confirmed FIP (step 2: 1.99; 2.20 respectively; step 3: 1.26; 2.30 respectively). The optimal cut-offs were 7.54 (LR+ 6.58), 0.62 (IY 0.67, sensitivity: 89.1%; specificity 77.7%), 0.72 (sensitivity and specificity: 79.2%) in step 2 and 2.27 (LR+ 10.39), 0.62 (IY 0.65, sensitivity: 82.1%; specificity 83.0%), 0.54 (sensitivity: 82.1%; specificity 81.9%) in step 3.

Conclusions: a high LDH/TNCC ratio support a FIP diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Predictive factors associated with short-term mortality in cats with feline infectious peritonitis treated with remdesivir or GS-441524 or both.

Goto S, Kamiyoshi T, Iwasaki R J Vet Intern Med. 2024; 39(1):e17249.

PMID: 39600237 PMC: 11638120. DOI: 10.1111/jvim.17249.


Measurement of Feline Alpha-1 Acid Glycoprotein in Serum and Effusion Using an ELISA Method: Analytical Validation and Diagnostic Role for Feline Infectious Peritonitis.

Romanelli P, Bertazzolo W, Prisciandaro A, Leone A, Bonfanti U, Paltrinieri S Pathogens. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38668244 PMC: 11055121. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13040289.

References
1.
Pedersen N, Perron M, Bannasch M, Montgomery E, Murakami E, Liepnieks M . Efficacy and safety of the nucleoside analog GS-441524 for treatment of cats with naturally occurring feline infectious peritonitis. J Feline Med Surg. 2019; 21(4):271-281. PMC: 6435921. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X19825701. View

2.
Tasker S . Diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis: Update on evidence supporting available tests. J Feline Med Surg. 2018; 20(3):228-243. PMC: 10816288. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X18758592. View

3.
Felten S, Weider K, Doenges S, Gruendl S, Matiasek K, Hermanns W . Detection of feline coronavirus spike gene mutations as a tool to diagnose feline infectious peritonitis. J Feline Med Surg. 2015; 19(4):321-335. PMC: 11119656. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X15623824. View

4.
Bauer N, Moritz A . Flow cytometric analysis of effusions in dogs and cats with the automated haematology analyser ADVIA 120. Vet Rec. 2005; 156(21):674-8. DOI: 10.1136/vr.156.21.674. View

5.
Pedersen N . An update on feline infectious peritonitis: diagnostics and therapeutics. Vet J. 2014; 201(2):133-41. PMC: 7110619. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.04.016. View