The Frequency of Cervical Cancer Screening. Comparison of a Mathematical Model with Empirical Data
Authors
Affiliations
The results of a mathematical model used to analyze the frequency of the Pap smear are compared with a recently published independent empirical study of data from large screening programs in Europe and North America. The model's predictions of the reduced incidence of invasive cervical cancer achieved with different screening frequencies match the empirical results closely--the predictions were within 1% of the empirical results for screening frequencies ranging from 1 to 10 years. The data indicate that compared with annual screening, screening every 2, 3, 5, and 10 years retains 99%, 97%, 89%, and 69%, respectively, of the effectiveness measured as a reduction in frequency of invasive cancer. The mathematical model underestimated the effectiveness of screening every 3 years, compared with screening every year.
Mandelblatt J, Schechter C, Levy D, Zauber A, Chang Y, Etzioni R Med Decis Making. 2012; 32(5):656-9.
PMID: 22990079 PMC: 4503228. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12458978.
Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines.
Stout N, Knudsen A, Kong C, McMahon P, Gazelle G Pharmacoeconomics. 2009; 27(7):533-45.
PMID: 19663525 PMC: 2787446. DOI: 10.2165/11314830-000000000-00000.
Modelling methods for pharmacoeconomics and health technology assessment: an overview and guide.
Stahl J Pharmacoeconomics. 2008; 26(2):131-48.
PMID: 18198933 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200826020-00004.
Low risk of cervical cancer during a long period after negative screening in the Netherlands.
van den Akker-van Marle M, van Ballegooijen M, Habbema J Br J Cancer. 2003; 88(7):1054-7.
PMID: 12671704 PMC: 2376374. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600843.
Taylor R, Morrell S, Mamoon H, Wain G J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001; 55(11):782-8.
PMID: 11604432 PMC: 1763307. DOI: 10.1136/jech.55.11.782.