» Articles » PMID: 36076229

Effect of Trochanter Displacement on Impingement and Bone Contact in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed After Curved Intertrochanteric Varus Osteotomy for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: a Simulation Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2022 Sep 8
PMID 36076229
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Curved intertrochanteric varus osteotomy (CVO) is a useful treatment option for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the effect of proximal femoral deformity in cases of CVO converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of trochanter displacement on impingement and the contact state of the implant and femur in THA.

Methods: Thirty-eight hips that had undergone CVO for ONFH were reviewed and compared with a control group of 30 contralateral hips that had not undergone surgery. The range of motion (ROM) and impingement patterns and the percentage of cortical bone in the stem placement within the femur were measured by simulation using CT-based three-dimensional template software. We also measured the ROM and the number of joints that achieved the ROM required for activities of daily living when the upward displaced apex of the greater trochanter with osteotomy was resected and compared the findings with those obtained when the apex was not resected.

Results: The CVO group showed a significantly greater bony impingement in external rotation (68.4% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.033) and abduction (78.9% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001) than in the control group. The CVO group showed a significantly smaller range of external rotation (19.0° [interquartile range; 4.0-28.8] vs. 38.0° [interquartile range; 36.0-41.8], p < 0.001) and abduction (23.0° [interquartile range; 8.5-38.8] vs. 56.0° [interquartile range; 50.3-60.0], p < 0.001) than in the control group. Significantly more joints achieved the ROM necessary for activities of daily living when the apex was resected than when it was not (10.5% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001). The percentage of cortical bone in the stem placement position was significantly higher in the CVO group than in the control group in the proximal portion of the stem (25.5% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In cases requiring conversion to THA, we recommend resecting the upward displaced apex to achieve a sufficient ROM and carefully resecting the bone to avoid malignment of the stem.

Citing Articles

Digital Templating of Hip Arthroplasty Using Microsoft PowerPoint: A Pilot Study with Technical Details.

Cha Y, Chung J, Kim J, Yoo J, Lee W, Kim J Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(4).

PMID: 38671749 PMC: 11048024. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11040327.

References
1.
Sugioka Y . Transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy in the treatment of idiopathic and steroid-induced femoral head necrosis, Perthes' disease, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and osteoarthritis of the hip. Indications and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; (184):12-23. View

2.
Osawa Y, Seki T, Takegami Y, Kusano T, Makida K, Ishiguro N . Cementless total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis produce similar results at ten years follow-up when matched for age and gender. Int Orthop. 2018; 42(7):1683-1688. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3987-7. View

3.
Osawa Y, Seki T, Okura T, Takegami Y, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y . Curved Intertrochanteric Varus Osteotomy vs Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head in Patients Under 50 Years Old. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(6):1600-1605. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.026. View

4.
Park K, Tumin M, Peni I, Yoon T . Conversion total hip arthroplasty after previous transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 29(4):813-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.012. View

5.
Zhao G, Yamamoto T, Ikemura S, Motomura G, Mawatari T, Nakashima Y . Radiological outcome analysis of transtrochanteric curved varus osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head at a mean follow-up of 12.4 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(6):781-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B6.23621. View