Acceptance, Experiences, and Needs of Hospitalized Pregnant Women Toward an Electronic Mindfulness-based Intervention: A Pilot Mixed-methods Study

Overview

Journal Front Psychiatry

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2022 Sep 8

PMID 36072461

Authors

Claudia Schiele

Maren Goetz

Kathrin Hassdenteufel

Mitho Muller

Johanna Graf

Stephan Zipfel

Stephanie Wallwiener

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Anxiety disorders and depression during pregnancy are highly prevalent. Hospitalized pregnant women with high maternal or fetal risk represent a particularly vulnerable population often excluded from research samples. Screening for mental health disorders is not routinely offered for this particular patient group. Electronic mindfulness-based interventions constitute an accessible, convenient, and cost-effective mental health resource but have not yet been evaluated for acceptance in inpatient settings. To date, little is known about the needs and perceptions of this group of women.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine whether a brief electronic mindfulness-based intervention (eMBI) is accepted among hospitalized high-risk pregnant women. We assessed personal motivation and barriers, experiences, usability requirements, and overall acceptance of the eMBI, as well the specific needs and demands of patients with high-risk pregnancies regarding mental health services.

Methods: An exploratory pilot study with a mixed-methods study design was carried out among 30 women hospitalized with a high obstetric risk. The study participants were given access to an eMBI with a 1-week mindfulness program on how to deal with stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the 30 participants and analyzed using systematic content analysis. In addition, acceptance and usability were assessed questionnaires.

Results: Study findings showed a high level of acceptance of the eMBI. Most of the respondents were satisfied with the usability and considered the eMBI program to be helpful. The greatest barriers to using the eMBI were a general negative attitude toward using apps, preference for personal contact, or no current need for psychotherapy. Participants criticized the lack of awareness of mental health issues during pregnancy and expressed a need for low-threshold treatment offers, especially during hospitalization.

Conclusions: There is a strong need for mental health services in pregnancy care, especially for pregnant women with risk profiles. An eMBI offers an acceptable means of providing mental health support for hospitalized women with a severe obstetric risk.

References

Tsakiridis I, Bousi V, Dagklis T, Sardeli C, Nikolopoulou V, Papazisis G . Epidemiology of antenatal depression among women with high-risk pregnancies due to obstetric complications: a scoping review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 300(4):849-859. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05270-1. View

Kelly R, Zatzick D, Anders T . The detection and treatment of psychiatric disorders and substance use among pregnant women cared for in obstetrics. Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158(2):213-9. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.2.213. View

Hall H, Beattie J, Lau R, East C, Biro M . Mindfulness and perinatal mental health: A systematic review. Women Birth. 2015; 29(1):62-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.08.006. View

Bennett H, Einarson A, Taddio A, Koren G, Einarson T . Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(4):698-709. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000116689.75396.5f. View

Heaman M . Stressful life events, social support, and mood disturbance in hospitalized and non-hospitalized women with pregnancy-induced hypertension. Can J Nurs Res. 1992; 24(1):23-37. View

Goetz M, Schiele C, Muller M, Matthies L, Deutsch T, Spano C . Effects of a Brief Electronic Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Relieving Prenatal Depression and Anxiety in Hospitalized High-Risk Pregnant Women: Exploratory Pilot Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(8):e17593. PMC: 7448174. DOI: 10.2196/17593. View

Marcus S, Flynn H, Blow F, Barry K . Depressive symptoms among pregnant women screened in obstetrics settings. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003; 12(4):373-80. DOI: 10.1089/154099903765448880. View

Huybrechts K, Palmsten K, Mogun H, Kowal M, Avorn J, Setoguchi-Iwata S . National trends in antidepressant medication treatment among publicly insured pregnant women. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013; 35(3):265-71. PMC: 4077674. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.12.010. View

Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

10.

Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin G, Masse M, Therien P, Bouchard V . Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013; 33(6):763-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005. View

11.

Melville J, Gavin A, Guo Y, Fan M, Katon W . Depressive disorders during pregnancy: prevalence and risk factors in a large urban sample. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(5):1064-70. PMC: 3068619. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f60b0a. View

12.

Baer R, Crane C, Miller E, Kuyken W . Doing no harm in mindfulness-based programs: Conceptual issues and empirical findings. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019; 71:101-114. PMC: 6575147. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.01.001. View

13.

Alder J, Fink N, Bitzer J, Hosli I, Holzgreve W . Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: a risk factor for obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcome? A critical review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007; 20(3):189-209. DOI: 10.1080/14767050701209560. View

14.

Moser A, Korstjens I . Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017; 24(1):9-18. PMC: 5774281. DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. View

15.

Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, Mamisashvili L, Tomlinson G, Vigod S . Maternal Anxiety During Pregnancy and the Association With Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018; 79(5). DOI: 10.4088/JCP.17r12011. View

16.

Goodman S, Dimidjian S, Williams K . Pregnant African American women's attitudes toward perinatal depression prevention. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2013; 19(1):50-7. DOI: 10.1037/a0030565. View

17.

Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

18.

Goodman J, Guarino A, Chenausky K, Klein L, Prager J, Petersen R . CALM Pregnancy: results of a pilot study of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for perinatal anxiety. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014; 17(5):373-87. PMC: 4107206. DOI: 10.1007/s00737-013-0402-7. View

19.

Szegda K, Markenson G, Bertone-Johnson E, Chasan-Taber L . Depression during pregnancy: a risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes? A critical review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 27(9):960-7. PMC: 4812822. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.845157. View

20.

Hubner-Liebermann B, Hausner H, Wittmann M . Recognizing and treating peripartum depression. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012; 109(24):419-24. PMC: 3394379. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0419. View