» Articles » PMID: 36069921

Predicting Success of Intrauterine Insemination Using a Clinically Based Scoring System

Overview
Date 2022 Sep 7
PMID 36069921
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop a predictive score for the success of intrauterine insemination (IUI) based on clinical parameters.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the homologous IUI cycles performed at a single university-based reproductive medical center between 2009 and 2017. The primary outcome measure was pregnancy, defined as positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 12-14 days after IUI. Predictive factors for pregnancy after IUI were identified, and a predictive score was developed using a multivariable continuation ratio model.

Results: Overall, 1437 IUI cycles in 758 couples were evaluated. We found a per cycle pregnancy rate of 10.9% and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 19.4%. In a multivariable analysis, the probability of pregnancy was negatively associated with female age ≥ 35 years (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.97, p = 0.034), endometriosis, unilateral tubal factor, or anatomical alteration (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.89, p = 0.016), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) < 1 ng/ml (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87, p = 0.014), and total progressive motile sperm count (TPMSC) < 5 mil (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.19-0.72, p = 0.004). We developed a predictive clinical score ranging from 0 to 5. Following 3 cycles, couples in our cohort with a score of 5 had a cumulative probability of achieving pregnancy of nearly 45%. In contrast, couples with a score of 0 had a cumulative probability of only 5%.

Conclusion: IUI success rates vary widely depending on couples' characteristics. A simple to use score could be used to estimate a couple's chance of achieving pregnancy via IUI, facilitating individualized counseling and decision-making.

Citing Articles

Intra-individual changes in sperm parameters and total motile count with time among infertile men.

Karavani G, Akroof B, Lau S, Lo K, Grober E, Mehra V Andrology. 2024; 13(2):226-233.

PMID: 38685862 PMC: 11815539. DOI: 10.1111/andr.13638.


Rescue intrauterine insemination in women failing to retrieve oocytes at ovum pick-up: report of a case series.

Muzii L, Galati G, La Barbiera I, Linari A, Capri O, Pietrangeli D J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(6):1527-1530.

PMID: 38635024 PMC: 11224174. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03091-z.


Is There Any Effect of Change in Pre-Wash and Post-Wash Semen Parameters on the Success of Intrauterine Insemination?.

Yavuzcan A, Yurtcu E, Keyif B, Osmanlioglu S J Pers Med. 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38248745 PMC: 10820498. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14010043.

References
1.
Gonzalez-Foruria I, Martinez F, Rodriguez-Purata J, Ballester M, Alonso-Mosquera V, Buxaderas R . Can anti-Müllerian hormone predict success outcomes in donor sperm inseminations?. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018; 35(1):40-43. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1499089. View

2.
Seckin B, Tokmak A, Yumusak O . The role of anti-Müllerian hormone in prediction of pregnancy in young and older women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination. J Chin Med Assoc. 2019; 82(4):300-304. DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000023. View

3.
Steyerberg E, Harrell Jr F, Borsboom G, Eijkemans M, Vergouwe Y, Habbema J . Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54(8):774-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00341-9. View

4.
Nuojua-Huttunen S, Tomas C, Bloigu R, Tuomivaara L, Martikainen H . Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(3):698-703. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.3.698. View

5.
Cantineau A, Cohlen B, Heineman M . Ovarian stimulation protocols (anti-oestrogens, gonadotrophins with and without GnRH agonists/antagonists) for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in women with subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (2):CD005356. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005356.pub2. View