» Articles » PMID: 36068381

SafetyCrown: a Patient-centered, Fully Digital Concept for Immediate Implant Restoration Following the One-abutment/one-time Concept-a Pilot Case Series of a New Treatment Concept

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Sep 6
PMID 36068381
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The patient-centered SafetyCrown-workflow enables the immediate restoration of posterior missing teeth and short free-end situations following one-abutment/one-time within three visits and only one surgical approach. This prosthodontic rehabilitation aims to combine the advantages of cemented and screw-retained restorations.

Report: The concept has been performed with 4 restorations in 3 patients and followed up for up to 1 year (mean: 11.2 months) without technical and/or biological complication. Visit 1: Intraoral optical impression, CBCT, and tooth shade selection. Virtual implant planning is performed, and a surgical guide is printed. After exporting the planned implant position, a tooth-colored abutment is fabricated from zirconia with a 1-mm supragingival cementation line, adhesively bonded to a titanium base. Visit 2: Fully navigated implant placement with insertion of the definitive abutment. Subsequently, optical impressions are prepared for A: immediate restoration using a PMMA crown without functional contacts; B: definitive crown fabricated from monolithic zirconia and individualized. The localization of the screw channel is marked using stain thus permitting precise screw channel access, if necessary. Visit 3: After osseointegration of the implant, the definitive crown is adhesively cemented supragingival. In a retrospective analysis of PROMs ('How stressful was the treatment process […]?' (0 = not stressful at all, 100 = very stressful), mean VAS score for SafetyCrown of 14 (SD 11.7) and 29.8 (SD 23.1) for standard procedure were present.

Conclusion: The SafetyCrown offers a shortened, patient-oriented concept for implant-supported single-tooth reconstructions omitting second-stage surgery. Clinical performance and hypothesized prosthodontic benefits require confirmation via an RCT.

Citing Articles

Effect of immediate all-digital restoration of single posterior implants: The SafetyCrown concept on patient-reported outcome measures, accuracy, and treatment time-A randomized clinical trial.

Waltenberger L, Reich S, Zwahlen M, Wolfart S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024; 26(6):1135-1148.

PMID: 39161052 PMC: 11660521. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13374.


The influence of immediate occlusal loading on micro/nano-structure of peri-implant jaw bone in rats.

Yorioka H, Otsu Y, Suzuki R, Matsunaga S, Nakano T, Abe S Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):24.

PMID: 38722448 PMC: 11082111. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00538-x.


Cross-sectional analysis comparing prefabricated titanium to individualized hybrid zirconia abutments for cemented zirconia based fixed dental prostheses: a critical concept assessment.

Neckel N, Pohl J, Preissner S, Wagendorf O, Sachse C, Vach K Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):13.

PMID: 38498247 PMC: 10948712. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00529-y.


Preload and friction in an implant-abutment-screw complex including a carbon-coated titanium alloy abutment screw: an in vitro study.

Sagheb K, Gorgen C, Doll S, Schmidtmann I, Wentaschek S Int J Implant Dent. 2023; 9(1):8.

PMID: 36947262 PMC: 10033796. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00473-3.


Immediate versus delayed implant placement in the esthetic zone: a prospective 3D volumetric assessment of peri-implant tissue stability.

Parvini P, Muller K, Cafferata E, Schwarz F, Obreja K Int J Implant Dent. 2022; 8(1):58.

PMID: 36434348 PMC: 9700553. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-022-00457-9.

References
1.
Nouh I, Kern M, Sabet A, Aboelfadl A, Hamdy A, Chaar M . Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 30(1):90-98. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13395. View

2.
Edinger D, Beuer F . Rehabilitation of one-piece screw-retained implant crowns placed at second-stage surgery-a retrospective patient series. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 25(3):1345-1351. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03442-x. View

3.
Wittneben J, Millen C, Bragger U . Clinical performance of screw- versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl:84-98. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.1. View

4.
Gallucci G, Hamilton A, Zhou W, Buser D, Chen S . Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 Suppl 16:106-134. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13276. View

5.
Atieh M, Tawse-Smith A, Alsabeeha N, Ma S, Duncan W . The One Abutment-One Time Protocol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Periodontol. 2017; 88(11):1173-1185. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2017.170238. View