Opportunities, Approaches and Challenges to the Engagement of Citizens in Filling Small Water Body Data Gaps

Overview

Journal Hydrobiologia

Date 2022 Sep 6

PMID 36065211

Authors

M Kelly-Quinn

J N Biggs

S Brooks

P Fortuno

S Hegarty

J I Jones

F Regan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Monitoring the condition (water quality, biodiversity, hydromorphology) of small water bodies presents a challenge for the relevant authorities in terms of time and resources (labour and financial) due to the extensive length of the stream network or the sheer number of small standing water bodies. Citizen science can help address information gaps, but the effort required should not be underestimated if such projects are to generate reliable and sustained data collection. The overall aim of this paper is to propose a framework for operationalisation of citizen science targeting collection of data from small water bodies. We first consider the data gaps and the elements (water chemistry, ecology, hydromorphology) to be addressed, in order to define where citizen science could best make an impact. We review examples of tools and methods that are appropriate for small water bodies, based on experience from a selection of freshwater citizen science projects, and the support that is needed for effective and sustained small water body projects across Europe.

Citing Articles

MassWateR: Improving quality control, analysis, and sharing of water quality data.

Beck M, Wetherill B, Carr J PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0293737.

PMID: 37910583 PMC: 10619867. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293737.

References

Hegarty S, Hayes A, Regan F, Bishop I, Clinton R . Using citizen science to understand river water quality while filling data gaps to meet United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 6 objectives. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 783:146953. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146953. View

Riley W, Potter E, Biggs J, Collins A, Jarvie H, Jones J . Small Water Bodies in Great Britain and Ireland: Ecosystem function, human-generated degradation, and options for restorative action. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 645:1598-1616. PMC: 6162339. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.243. View

Rasmussen J, McKnight U, Loinaz M, Thomsen N, Olsson M, Bjerg P . A catchment scale evaluation of multiple stressor effects in headwater streams. Sci Total Environ. 2012; 442:420-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.076. View

Mormina M, Pinder S . A conceptual framework for training of trainers (ToT) interventions in global health. Global Health. 2018; 14(1):100. PMC: 6198384. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-018-0420-3. View

Quinlivan L, Chapman D, Sullivan T . Applying citizen science to monitor for the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2: a review. Environ Monit Assess. 2020; 192(4):218. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-8193-6. View

McGoff E, Dunn F, Moliner Cachazo L, Williams P, Biggs J, Nicolet P . Finding clean water habitats in urban landscapes: professional researcher vs citizen science approaches. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 581-582:105-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.215. View

Schmeller D, Henry P, Julliard R, Gruber B, Clobert J, Dziock F . Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conserv Biol. 2009; 23(2):307-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01125.x. View

Pawlowski J, Kelly-Quinn M, Altermatt F, Apotheloz-Perret-Gentil L, Beja P, Boggero A . The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 637-638:1295-1310. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.002. View

Scott A, Frost P . Monitoring water quality in Toronto's urban stormwater ponds: Assessing participation rates and data quality of water sampling by citizen scientists in the FreshWater Watch. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 592:738-744. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.201. View

10.

Bonney R, Shirk J, Phillips T, Wiggins A, Ballard H, Miller-Rushing A . Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science. Science. 2014; 343(6178):1436-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251554. View

11.

Peeters E, Gerritsen A, Seelen L, Begheyn M, Rienks F, Teurlincx S . Monitoring biological water quality by volunteers complements professional assessments. PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0263899. PMC: 8880917. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263899. View

12.

Lottig N, Wagner T, Henry E, Spence Cheruvelil K, Webster K, Downing J . Long-term citizen-collected data reveal geographical patterns and temporal trends in lake water clarity. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e95769. PMC: 4005745. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095769. View

13.

Silvertown J . A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009; 24(9):467-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017. View

14.

Jollymore A, Haines M, Satterfield T, Johnson M . Citizen science for water quality monitoring: Data implications of citizen perspectives. J Environ Manage. 2017; 200:456-467. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.083. View

15.

Thornhill I, Ho J, Zhang Y, Li H, Ho K, Miguel-Chinchilla L . Prioritising local action for water quality improvement using citizen science; a study across three major metropolitan areas of China. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 584-585:1268-1281. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.200. View

16.

Blocher J, Ward M, Matthaei C, Piggott J . Multiple stressors and stream macroinvertebrate community dynamics: Interactions between fine sediment grain size and flow velocity. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 717:137070. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137070. View