» Articles » PMID: 36060344

Submental Intubation in Maxillofacial Procedures: A More Desired Approach Than Nasotracheal Intubation and Tracheostomy

Abstract

To achieve adequate airway management in maxillofacial procedures, the right intubation technique should be employed. This is because the surgeons and the anesthesiologists will need to work in the same surgical field to ensure a successful procedure. The type of intubation method used can either complicate either's role or pose some difficulties in the surgery itself. Nasotracheal intubation and orotracheal intubation may often be contraindicated in different types of maxillofacial surgeries and due to the complications associated with a tracheostomy, this method is often utilized as a last resort. Submental intubation has become very popular and favored alternative and has been associated with fewer complications. This literature review was conducted to explore the indications, complications, and contraindications of the different intubation methods. Sources were gathered from PubMed Central, PubMed, and Google scholar and included articles published between 2012 and 2022. A mix of literature reviews, case base studies, retrospective studies, prospective studies, and a few systematic reviews were examined. It was found that the use of submental intubation was preferred due to its less invasive nature, minimal intraoperatively and postoperatively complications, and greater patient compliance compared to tracheostomy. In addition, it is the best method when Nasotracheal intubation is contraindicated.

Citing Articles

Patient Age Predicts Nasal Septal Deviation in Orthognathic Surgery: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial of 102 Participants.

Taxis J, Florian H, Napodano G, Rink M, Nieberle F, Himmelstoss K Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768880 PMC: 11676348. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60122000.


Endotracheal tube exchange over bougie through submental route in a patient with panfacial trauma.

Rajan S, Ravindran V, Krishnadas A, Karthikeyan S J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025; 40(4):718-719.

PMID: 39759063 PMC: 11694866. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_211_23.


Submental Intubation: Clinical Anatomy and Video Technical Note.

Rohee-Traore A, Gagnieur P, Gleizal A, Daurade M Head Neck. 2024; 47(3):1058-1061.

PMID: 39722603 PMC: 11816558. DOI: 10.1002/hed.28050.


Unlocking the Potential of Submental Intubation - Redefining Airway Management in Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Patients.

Mahajan A, Daithankar S, Dholabhai P, Singh A, Shah A, Shah N Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024; :19433875241278797.

PMID: 39553800 PMC: 11563016. DOI: 10.1177/19433875241278797.


Submental/submandibular intubation: a journey from past to future.

Park K, Karm M Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2024; 19(4):280-293.

PMID: 39512050 PMC: 11558050. DOI: 10.17085/apm.24120.


References
1.
Mishra R, Yadav D, Tripathi S, Kandel L, Baral P, Shubham S . Submental Intubations in Panfacial Fractures. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020; 12:41-48. PMC: 7036666. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S228326. View

2.
Kumar K, Pavan Kumar B, Mohan A, Masram A, Tyro D, Gandla D . Assessment of the Efficacy of Submental Intubation in the Management of Midfacial and Panfacial Trauma Patients. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015; 14(3):674-81. PMC: 4510075. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-014-0684-y. View

3.
Kita R, Kikuta T, Takahashi M, Ootani T, Takaoka M, Matsuda M . Efficacy and complications of submental tracheal intubation compared with tracheostomy in maxillofacial trauma patients. J Oral Sci. 2016; 58(1):23-8. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.58.23. View

4.
Prasanna D, Bhat S . Nasotracheal Intubation: An Overview. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015; 13(4):366-72. PMC: 4518776. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-013-0516-5. View

5.
Cheong Y, Kang S, Kim M, Son H, Park J, Kim J . Submental Intubation in Patients with Complex Maxillofacial Injuries. J Lifestyle Med. 2016; 6(2):68-71. PMC: 5115205. DOI: 10.15280/jlm.2016.6.2.68. View