» Articles » PMID: 36059092

Current Practice Patterns of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Sampling for Pancreatic Solid Mass in Korea: Outcomes of a National Survey

Abstract

Background/aims: Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) are widely used for tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid mass, the optimal strategy of this procedure has not been established yet. The aim of this nationwide study was to investigate the current practice patterns of EUS-FNA/FNB for pancreatic solid mass in Korea.

Methods: The Policy-Quality Management of the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association (KPBA) developed a questionnaire containing 22 questions. An electronic survey consisting of the questionnaire was distributed by e-mail to members registered to the KPBA.

Results: A total of 101 respondents completed the survey. Eighty respondents (79.2%) performed preoperative EUS-FNA/FNB for operable pancreatic solid mass. Acquire needles (60.4%) were used the most, followed by ProCore needles (47.5%). In terms of need size, most respondents (>80%) preferred 22-gauge needles regardless of the location of the mass. Negative suction with a 10-mL syringe (71.3%) as sampling technique was followed by stylet slow-pull (41.6%). More than three needle passes for EUS-FNA/FNB was performed by most respondents (>80%). The frequency of requiring repeated procedure was significantly higher in respondents with a low individual volume (<5 per month, p=0.001). Prophylactic antibiotics were routinely used in 39 respondents (38.6%); rapid on-site pathologic evaluation was used in 6.1%.

Conclusions: According to this survey, practices of EUS-FNA/FNB for pancreatic solid mass varied substantially, some of which differed considerably from the recommendations present in existing guidelines. These results suggest that the development of evidence-based quality guidelines fitting Korean clinical practice is needed to establish the optimal strategy for this procedure.

Citing Articles

Avoid non-diagnostic EUS-FNA: a DNN model as a possible gatekeeper to distinguish pancreatic lesions prone to inconclusive biopsy.

Qu W, Yang J, Li J, Yuan G, Li S, Chu Q Br J Radiol. 2023; 96(1151):20221112.

PMID: 37195026 PMC: 10607397. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20221112.

References
1.
Brugge W, DeWitt J, Klapman J, Ashfaq R, Shidham V, Chhieng D . Techniques for cytologic sampling of pancreatic and bile duct lesions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014; 42(4):333-7. DOI: 10.1002/dc.23096. View

2.
Ngamruengphong S, Swanson K, Shah N, Wallace M . Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration does not impair survival of patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2015; 64(7):1105-10. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307475. View

3.
van Riet P, Cahen D, Poley J, Bruno M . Mapping international practice patterns in EUS-guided tissue sampling: outcome of a global survey. Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4(3):E360-70. PMC: 4873668. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-101023. View

4.
Nakai Y, Hamada T, Hakuta R, Sato T, Ishigaki K, Saito K . A Meta-analysis of Slow Pull versus Suction for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition. Gut Liver. 2021; 15(4):625-633. PMC: 8283288. DOI: 10.5009/gnl20270. View

5.
Li H, Li W, Zhou Q, Fan B . Fine needle biopsy is superior to fine needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound guided sampling of pancreatic masses: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(13):e0207. PMC: 5895392. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010207. View