» Articles » PMID: 36057459

Accessibility of HIV Services in Philadelphia: Location-Allocation Analysis

Overview
Journal Am J Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Sep 3
PMID 36057459
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: As the first step in the HIV care continuum, timely diagnosis is central to reducing transmission of the virus and ending the HIV epidemic. Studies have shown that distance from a testing site is essential for ease of access to services and educational material. This study shows how location-allocation analysis can be used to improve allocation of HIV testing services utilizing existing publicly available data from 2015 to 2019 on HIV prevalence, testing site location, and factors related to HIV in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Methods: The ArcGIS Location-Allocation analytic tool was used to calculate locations for HIV testing sites using a method that minimizes the distance between demand-point locations and service facilities. ZIP code level demand was initially specified on the basis of the percentage of late HIV diagnoses and in a sensitivity analysis on the basis of a composite of multiple factors. Travel time and distance from demand to facilities determined the facility location allocation. This analysis was conducted from 2021 to 2022.

Results: Compared with the 37 facilities located in 20 (43%) Philadelphia ZIP codes, the model proposed reallocating testing facilities to 37 (79%) ZIP codes using percent late diagnoses to define demand. On average, this would reduce distance to the facilities by 65% and travel time to the facilities by 56%. Results using the sensitivity analysis were similar.

Conclusions: A wider distribution of HIV testing services across the city of Philadelphia may reduce distance and travel time to facilities, improve accessibility of testing, and in turn increase the percentage of people with knowledge of their status.

Citing Articles

A catchment and location-allocation analysis of mammography access in Delaware, US: implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening.

Webster J, Goldstein N, Rowland J, Tuite C, Siegel S Breast Cancer Res. 2023; 25(1):137.

PMID: 37941020 PMC: 10631173. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01738-w.


Alignment of Ending the HIV Epidemic Priority Jurisdictions With Availability of HIV Service Organizations: An Ecological Study.

Webster J, Rafalko N, Thorpe L, Duncan D, Gracely E, Goldstein N AIDS Educ Prev. 2023; 35(4):320-331.

PMID: 37535323 PMC: 11504299. DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2023.35.4.320.


A Catchment and Location-Allocation Analysis of Mammography Access in Delaware, US: Implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening.

Webster J, Goldstein N, Rowland J, Tuite C, Siegel S Res Sq. 2023; .

PMID: 36909545 PMC: 10002803. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2600236/v1.

References
1.
Hamilton A, Thompson N, Choko A, Hlongwa M, Jolly P, Korte J . HIV Self-Testing Uptake and Intervention Strategies Among Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:594298. PMC: 7933016. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.594298. View

2.
Decker M, Isquick S, Tilley L, Zhi Q, Gutman A, Luong W . Neighborhoods matter. A systematic review of neighborhood characteristics and adolescent reproductive health outcomes. Health Place. 2018; 54:178-190. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.09.001. View

3.
Grigsby-Toussaint D, Shin J, Jones A . Disparities in the distribution of COVID-19 testing sites in black and Latino areas in new York City. Prev Med. 2021; 147:106463. PMC: 9753026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106463. View

4.
Horst M, Jammula S, Gross B, Bradburn E, Cook A, Altenburg J . Development of a trauma system and optimal placement of trauma centers using geospatial mapping. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017; 84(3):441-448. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001782. View

5.
Mathews A, Farley S, Conserve D, Knight K, LeMarus A, Blumberg M . "Meet people where they are": a qualitative study of community barriers and facilitators to HIV testing and HIV self-testing among African Americans in urban and rural areas in North Carolina. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):494. PMC: 7161271. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08582-z. View