» Articles » PMID: 36051968

The Effects of Robot-assisted Gait Training Combined with Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Lower Limb Function in Patients with Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Sep 2
PMID 36051968
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) therapy combined with non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on lower limb function in patients with stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI).

Data Sources: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science were searched.

Study Selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published as of 3 March 2021. RCTs evaluating RAGT combined with NIBS, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), for lower limb function (e.g., Fugl-Meyer assessment for patients with stroke) and activities (i.e., gait velocity) in patients with stroke and SCI were included.

Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently screened the records, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias.

Data Synthesis: A meta-analysis of five studies (104 participants) and risk of bias were conducted. Pooled estimates demonstrated that RAGT combined with NIBS significantly improved lower limb function [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.06-0.99] but not lower limb activities (SMD = -0.13; 95% CI = -0.63-0.38). Subgroup analyses also failed to find a greater improvement in lower limb function of RAGT with tDCS compared to sham stimulation. No significant differences between participant characteristics or types of NIBS were observed.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that RAGT therapy in combination with NIBS was effective in patients with stroke and SCI. However, a greater improvement in lower limb function and activities were not observed using RAGT with tDCS compared to sham stimulation.

Citing Articles

Non-invasive cerebral and spinal cord stimulation for motor and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hernandez-Navarro A, Ros-Alsina A, Yurtseven M, Wright M, Kumru H J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):53.

PMID: 40050875 PMC: 11887137. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01557-4.


Effectiveness of robot-assisted training in adults with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lazzarini S, Mosconi B, Cordani C, Arienti C, Cecchi F J Neurol. 2024; 272(1):22.

PMID: 39666104 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12798-z.


Effect of robotic exoskeleton training on lower limb function, activity and participation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yang J, Zhu Y, Li H, Wang K, Li D, Qi Q Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1453781.

PMID: 39193147 PMC: 11347425. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1453781.


Effects of robotic therapy associated with noninvasive brain stimulation on motor function in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Alashram A J Spinal Cord Med. 2024; 48(1):6-21.

PMID: 38265422 PMC: 11749291. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2304921.


Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Gait Disturbance in Post-Stroke Patients: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Chamorro-Hinojosa J, Molina-Rueda F, Carratala-Tejada M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(23).

PMID: 38067673 PMC: 10708691. DOI: 10.3390/s23239301.


References
1.
Murray L, Edwards D, Ruffini G, Labar D, Stampas A, Pascual-Leone A . Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PMC: 4380548. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.11.004. View

2.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

3.
Cheung E, Ng T, Yu K, Kwan R, Cheing G . Robot-Assisted Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(11):2320-2331.e12. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.015. View

4.
OBrien A, Bertolucci F, Torrealba-Acosta G, Huerta R, Fregni F, Thibaut A . Non-invasive brain stimulation for fine motor improvement after stroke: a meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2018; 25(8):1017-1026. DOI: 10.1111/ene.13643. View

5.
Chen J, Lin W, Cha J, So P, Kubota Y, Nedivi E . Structural basis for the role of inhibition in facilitating adult brain plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(5):587-94. PMC: 3083474. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2799. View