» Articles » PMID: 36046177

Application of Transperineal Pelvic Floor Ultrasound in Changes of Pelvic Floor Structure and Function Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2022 Sep 1
PMID 36046177
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the changes of pelvic floor tissue structure and function between pregnant and non-pregnant women from the view of transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound.

Methods: Thirty-eight cases of women with a second singleton pregnancy and thirty-two cases of women with a first singleton pregnancy underwent transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound, and their results were compared with forty-two cases of healthy non-pregnant women.

Results: The differences of bladder neck descent (BND), rectal ampulla distance and levator hiatus area (LHA) among the three groups were statistically significant (P<0.05), and the differences of BND, rectal ampulla distance, LHA between the women with a second singleton pregnancy group and non-pragnent group were statistically significant (P<0.05). The BND, retrovesical angle at rest (RVA-R) and retrovesical angle underwent Valsalva maneuver (RVA-V) in the group of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) during pregnancy were larger than those in non-SUI group, with significant difference (P<0.05), especially BND and RVA-V (P = 0.00).

Conclusion: Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound has a high resolution of pelvic floor structure and function changes during pregnancy, and can dynamically evaluate pelvic floor function, providing a theoretical basis for early diagnosis and prevention of female pelvic floor dysfunction (FPFD) in subsequent pregnancies.

Citing Articles

Application of transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound in postpartum pelvic organ injury and prolapse in women.

Deng S, Jiang Q, Zhang Y Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(9):4830-4839.

PMID: 39398589 PMC: 11470310. DOI: 10.62347/HFEQ7335.


Electromyographic activity of pelvic floor muscles in different positions during the use an innovative vaginal educator: Cross-sectional study.

Duarte N, Azevedo Y, Furtado E, Araujo L, Bendelack R, Rodrigues C PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0291588.

PMID: 38536803 PMC: 10971574. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291588.

References
1.
GREEN Jr T . Urinary stress incontinence: differential diagnosis, pathophysiology, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975; 122(3):368-400. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90186-6. View

2.
Hoyte L, Damaser M, Warfield S, Chukkapalli G, Majumdar A, Choi D . Quantity and distribution of levator ani stretch during simulated vaginal childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 199(2):198.e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.027. View

3.
Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Rahimi S, Negro R, Vergara D, Martignago R . Age-related pelvic floor modifications and prolapse risk factors in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2009; 17(1):204-12. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181b0c2ae. View

4.
Olsen A, Smith V, Bergstrom J, Colling J, Clark A . Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89(4):501-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6. View

5.
Lin K, Shen C, Wu M, Long C, Wu C, Wang C . Comparison of low urinary tract symptoms during pregnancy between primiparous and multiparous women. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:303697. PMC: 4241740. DOI: 10.1155/2014/303697. View