» Articles » PMID: 36038826

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Colposcopy in the Diagnosis of Histologic Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+)

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Aug 29
PMID 36038826
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Colposcopy is a tool for triaging screen positive women regardless of method used for cervical cancer screening. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of colposcopy in the diagnosis of histologic cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN 2+) at Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital (JDWNRH), Thimphu, Bhutan.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2021 to August 2021 among 299 women who availed colposcopy services at the colposcopy clinic of JDWNRH, Bhutan. Women included in this study were either screen positive (Pap smear) or were suspected to have invasive cancer; they underwent colposcopy and a cervical biopsy irrespective of colposcopy impression. This histopathologic assessment was considered as the gold standard test for the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or invasive cancer.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 43 years (ranges, 25-76 years). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of senior colposcopists to diagnose histologic CIN 2+ were 80.0% (95% CI 59.30, 93.17), 71.07% (95% CI 62.13, 78.95), and 72.60% (95% CI 64.61, 79.65), and for junior colposcopists were 59.46% (95% CI 42.10, 75.25), 76.72% (95% CI 67.97, 84.04), and 72.55% (95% CI 64.76, 79.45) respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of colposcopy to diagnose histologic CIN 2+ were 66.67% (95% CI 53.66, 78.05), 73.73% (95% CI 67.63, 79.23), and 72.24% (95% CI 66.79, 77.24) respectively.

Conclusions: In this study, the senior and junior colposcopists had a comparable colposcopic accuracy to diagnose histologic CIN 2+, whereas senior had a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity than junior colposcopists.

Citing Articles

Do Human Papilloma Virus and Cytological Testing Results Before Colposcopy Alter the Pathological Grading of Colposcopy Acetic Acid Visual Examination?: A Retrospective Study.

Gao S, Qian B, Wang T, Wang J Int J Womens Health. 2025; 17:201-209.

PMID: 39902401 PMC: 11789670. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S490355.


Reproducibility of colposcopy quality indicators-A survey among members of the European Federation for Colposcopy.

Randrup T, Leeson S, Ciavattini A, Eldib A, Grigore M, van Haaften-de Jong A Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024; 103(9):1745-1752.

PMID: 38922851 PMC: 11324934. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14895.


Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of colposcopy in the detection of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions among women with transformation zone type 3.

Li X, Zhao Y, Xiang F, Zhang X, Chen Z, Zhang M BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):381.

PMID: 38528547 PMC: 10964607. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12156-2.


Detection of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and assessing diagnostic performance of colposcopy among women with oncogenic HPV.

Li X, Xiang F, Zhao Y, Li Q, Gu Q, Zhang X BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23(1):411.

PMID: 37542333 PMC: 10403922. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02538-2.


Human Papillomavirus E7 and p16 mRNA Multiplexed Quantification by a QuantiGene Proof-of-Concept Assay Sensitively Detects Infection and Cervical Dysplasia Severity.

Skof A, Rotenberg L, Hannemann P, Thies S, Boschetti-Grutzmacher E, Kaufmann A Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 36980443 PMC: 10047034. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061135.


References
1.
Ara R, Khatun S, Pervin S, Jahan M, Shahera U, Ferdous J . Role of molecular biomarker human papilloma virus (HPV) E6 oncoprotein in cervical cancer screening. Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 158(3):590-596. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.496. View

2.
Bowring J, Strander B, Young M, Evans H, Walker P . The Swede score: evaluation of a scoring system designed to improve the predictive value of colposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2010; 14(4):301-5. DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181d77756. View

3.
Baussano I, Tshomo U, Clifford G, Tenet V, Tshokey T, Franceschi S . Cervical cancer screening program in Thimphu, Bhutan: population coverage and characteristics associated with screening attendance. BMC Womens Health. 2014; 14:147. PMC: 4258285. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-014-0147-0. View

4.
Perkins R, Guido R, Castle P, Chelmow D, Einstein M, Garcia F . 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020; 24(2):102-131. PMC: 7147428. DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000525. View

5.
Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P, Girardi F, Haefner H, Menton M . 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(1):166-72. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318254f90c. View