» Articles » PMID: 36035047

Antibiogram at a Rural Hospital Against the Background of COVID-19: A Five-Year Retrospective Review

Abstract

Background and objective The role of the antibiogram in reducing hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality rate, health care costs, and, by extension, patients' social, physical, and emotional wellness has a significant impact on the medical community. Hospitals in large cities serve a dynamic population of diverse ethnic groups. Many scholarly works and publications have shown that the antimicrobial pattern in rural settings has significant variability annually. Over the last two years, the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought about many unknowns in the sphere of healthcare. The pattern of pathology accompanying COVID-19 has affected hospital policies and direct patient management, leading to a paradigm shift in approaches, policies, and resource utilization. The years 2019 to 2021 were marked by many admissions due to COVID-19, and the effects of COVID-19 are still being studied. In light of this, this study examined the changes in sensitivity patterns, new trends, and nature of bacteria isolates, antimicrobial rates, and susceptibility based on a rural hospital's annual antibiogram pertaining to its central departments: the intensive care unit (ICU), patient care unit (PCU), the outpatient unit, and emergency department (ED). Methods This five-year retrospective antibiogram review compared antibiogram patterns two years before the first case of COVID-19 was reported in the hospital and those two years after the initial outbreak. Results The organism comparative susceptibility tests for were not significant except for increased susceptibility toward nitrofurantoin (p=0.003); ( was also not significant except for the increased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (p=0.003). had no changes in susceptibility patterns, while had increased susceptibility to imipenem (p=0.05), aztreonam (p=0.00), and meropenem (p=0.004), with reduced susceptibility to gentamicin (97.47% vs. 88.24%, p=0.006). There was a whopping decrease in the sensitivity of methicillin-resistant  (MRSA) to clindamycin (75.93% vs. 50.7%, p=0.000), linezolid (99.54% vs. 88.73, p=0.004), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (92.59% vs. 74.65%, p=0.001), and vancomycin (99.54% vs. 88.73%, p=0.004). had no significant variation except an increase in susceptibility to nitrofurantoin (p=0.023), and perhaps ironically, had no significant changes in susceptibility pattern. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that the susceptibility of different drugs against different bacterial pathogens varied. However, some antibiotic drugs were found to have high susceptibility against different isolated organisms, and these drugs include amikacin, levofloxacin, vancomycin, cefotaxime, nitrofurantoin, and ceftriaxone. Some organisms showed a significantly declined antibiotic susceptibility, while others showed a significant improvement. The role of COVID-19 regarding these changes is unknown. COVID-19 may not be the cause of the observed differences. We believe that further research on antibiotic legislation and prescribing trends is required. Other non-significant study findings may be attributed to the limited data available to us.

Citing Articles

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Staphylococcus aureus infections in pediatric patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia.

Ai L, Fang L, Zhou C, Liu B, Yang Q, Gong F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):15737.

PMID: 38977804 PMC: 11231152. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66071-4.


Molecular Markers of Pancreatic Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Review of Molecular Advances.

Jacks B, Ekpemiro C, Adeosun A, Ogbonna U, Ogundiran F, Babalola F Cureus. 2022; 14(9):e29485.

PMID: 36299966 PMC: 9588177. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29485.

References
1.
ODowd A . Tackling antimicrobial resistance should be "top five" priority for UK government, MPs urge. BMJ. 2018; 363:k4444. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4444. View

2.
Barnes M, Bethel C, Alsop J, Becka S, Rutter J, Papp-Wallace K . Inactivation of the Pseudomonas-Derived Cephalosporinase-3 (PDC-3) by Relebactam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018; 62(5). PMC: 5923161. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02406-17. View

3.
Getahun H, Smith I, Trivedi K, Paulin S, Balkhy H . Tackling antimicrobial resistance in the COVID-19 pandemic. Bull World Health Organ. 2020; 98(7):442-442A. PMC: 7375214. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.20.268573. View

4.
Adebisi Y, Alaran A, Okereke M, Oke G, Amos O, Olaoye O . COVID-19 and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Review. Infect Dis (Auckl). 2021; 14:11786337211033870. PMC: 8327234. DOI: 10.1177/11786337211033870. View

5.
Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick B, Lin T, Cheng Z . Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv. 2018; 37(1):177-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013. View