» Articles » PMID: 36033790

Managing the Introduction of Genomic Applications into the National Health Service: A Special Challenge for Health Technology Assessment in Italy

Abstract

In recent years, the rapid proliferation of genomic tests for use in clinical practice has prompted healthcare systems to use a health technology assessment (HTA) approach to distinguish valuable from unwarranted applications. In this study, we narratively review the Italian HTA mechanisms for medical devices (MDs), both at the national and regional levels, and discuss the opportunity and benefits of extending them to genomic technologies, for which a dedicated assessment path was advocated by the National Plan for Public Health Genomics in 2017. We found that the National Health Technology Assessment Program for MDs, completed in 2019, had developed a structured pathway for the HTA of MDs; it established a hub-and-spoke structure, run by a governmental institution, and put in place transparent methodological procedures to cover all four HTA phases (i.e., proposal and prioritization, assessment, appraisal, and dissemination). However, several factors have hindered its adoption, and the regions are at different stages of its implementation. For these reasons, efforts should be made to ensure its effective deployment, both at national and regional levels. In addition, we argue that to harmonize the institutional roles and methodological procedures adopted, the time has come to concentrate resources on a single pathway for the assessment of all technologies that include both MDs and genomic applications.

Citing Articles

Pioneering the implementation of a precision oncology strategy in Portugal: the Precision Oncology Platform trial.

Mainoli B, Assis J, Dinis J, Henrique R, Oliveira J Acta Oncol. 2024; 63:482-486.

PMID: 38910310 PMC: 11332531. DOI: 10.2340/1651-226X.2023.33322.


[Genomics in Public Health Scientific evidence and prospects for integration in the prevention practice].

Traversi D, Calabro G, Francese C, Franchitti E, Pulliero A, Spatera P J Prev Med Hyg. 2023; 63(3 Suppl 2):E1-E29.

PMID: 36818497 PMC: 9910509. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2022.63.3s2.

References
1.
Love-Koh J, Peel A, Rejon-Parrilla J, Ennis K, Lovett R, Manca A . The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 36(12):1439-1451. PMC: 6244622. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0686-6. View

2.
Pitini E, DAndrea E, De Vito C, Rosso A, Unim B, Marzuillo C . A proposal of a new evaluation framework towards implementation of genetic tests. PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0219755. PMC: 6681956. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219755. View

3.
Traversi D, Pulliero A, Izzotti A, Franchitti E, Iacoviello L, Gianfagna F . Precision Medicine and Public Health: New Challenges for Effective and Sustainable Health. J Pers Med. 2021; 11(2). PMC: 7920275. DOI: 10.3390/jpm11020135. View

4.
ORourke B, Oortwijn W, Schuller T . The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020; 36(3):187-190. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462320000215. View

5.
Pitini E, De Vito C, Marzuillo C, DAndrea E, Rosso A, Federici A . How is genetic testing evaluated? A systematic review of the literature. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018; 26(5):605-615. PMC: 5945588. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0095-5. View