» Articles » PMID: 36033352

Characterizing Nigerien Men's Social Networks and Their Influence on Family Planning-related Attitudes and Behaviors

Overview
Date 2022 Aug 29
PMID 36033352
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This work uses data from a family planning (FP) program evaluation and social network study among men married to adolescent girls (ages 13-19) in Dosso, Niger to explore who influences their FP and through which social mechanisms. We asked men (N = 237) to nominate and describe their perceptions of key social contacts (alters). We sought to interview the most influential alter (N = 157 interviewed alters), asking them about their own FP-related attitudes and behaviors. Men primarily nominated male friends as alters. We found that men participating in the program were more likely to perceive alters to hold attitudes supportive of gender equitable FP decisions (AOR: 4.36, 95% CI: 1.83, 10.35) and FP use (AOR: 4.22, 95% CI: 1.72, 10.35). Alters' attitudes supporting FP were related to those of the men who nominated them (1-unit increase in alters' attitudes score related to a 0.48 unit increase in men's attitudes; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.63). Men who perceived their alters would support gender equitable FP decisions were more likely to have ever used FP methods (AOR: 10.43, 95% CI: 2.50, 43.58) as were those who perceived their alters would support their own FP use (AOR: 12.76, 95% CI: 2.55, 63.81). Men who perceived their alters would support gender equitable FP decisions were more likely to report spousal communication (AOR: 8.71, 95% CI: 3.06, 24.83), as were those who perceived that alters would support their own FP use (AOR: 9.06, 95% CI: 3.01, 27.26). Alters' and men's behaviors (contraceptive use and spousal communication) were not associated. These results demonstrate that perceived approval from network members may be critical to FP-related attitudes and behaviors. However, since FP promotion programs may affect perception and/or composition of social networks, future research should include larger sample sizes and longitudinal data to understand the effect of changing norms on social relationships.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Review of Determinants Influencing Family Planning and Contraceptive Use.

Feriani P, Yunitasari E, Efendi F, Krisnana I, Ernawati R, Tianingrum N Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2024; 29(5):596-607.

PMID: 39478710 PMC: 11521132. DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_321_23.

References
1.
Rutenberg N, Watkins S . The buzz outside the clinics: conversations and contraception in Nyanza Province, Kenya. Stud Fam Plann. 1998; 28(4):290-307. View

2.
Green L, Richard L, Potvin L . Ecological foundations of health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10(4):270-81. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.270. View

3.
Madhavan S, Adams A . Women's networks and the social world of fertility behavior. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2003; 29(2):58-68. DOI: 10.1363/ifpp.29.058.03. View

4.
Lowe S, Moore S . Social networks and female reproductive choices in the developing world: a systematized review. Reprod Health. 2014; 11:85. PMC: 4275947. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-85. View

5.
Samandari G, Grant C, Brent L, Gullo S . "It is a thing that depends on God": barriers to delaying first birth and pursuing alternative futures among newly married adolescent girls in Niger. Reprod Health. 2019; 16(1):109. PMC: 6637607. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0757-y. View