» Articles » PMID: 36032354

Do Your Own Research!

Overview
Journal Synthese
Date 2022 Aug 29
PMID 36032354
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Philosophical tradition and conspiracy theorists converge in suggesting that ordinary people ought to do their own research, rather than accept the word of others. In this paper, I argue that it's no accident that conspiracy theorists value lay research on expert topics: such research is likely to undermine knowledge, via its effects on truth and justification. Accepting expert testimony is a far more reliable route to truth. Nevertheless, lay research has a range of benefits; in particular, it is likely to lead to greater understanding, even when it does not lead to knowledge. I argue that we can reap most of the genuine benefits of lay research while minimizing the risks by engaging in exploratory, rather than truth-directed, inquiry. To engage in exploratory inquiry is to engage dogmatically, expecting to be unable to confirm the expert view or to disconfirm rivals.

Citing Articles

Lay Knowledge and Beliefs Toward Dementia Among the Black African Populations in the UK and Africa: Evidence Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.

Mokwenye R J Prim Care Community Health. 2024; 15():21501319241291786.

PMID: 39431639 PMC: 11503823. DOI: 10.1177/21501319241291786.


Bad social norms rather than bad believers: examining the role of social norms in bad beliefs.

Muller B Synthese. 2024; 203(2):63.

PMID: 38356922 PMC: 10861743. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-024-04483-5.


Too humble for words.

Levy N Philos Stud. 2023; 180(10-11):3141-3160.

PMID: 37786461 PMC: 10541816. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-023-02031-4.

References
1.
Mills C, Keil F . Knowing the limits of one's understanding: the development of an awareness of an illusion of explanatory depth. J Exp Child Psychol. 2003; 87(1):1-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2003.09.003. View

2.
Klein C, Clutton P, Dunn A . Pathways to conspiracy: The social and linguistic precursors of involvement in Reddit's conspiracy theory forum. PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0225098. PMC: 6860422. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225098. View

3.
Kahneman D, Klein G . Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. Am Psychol. 2009; 64(6):515-26. DOI: 10.1037/a0016755. View

4.
Rozenblit L, Keil F . The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth. Cogn Sci. 2011; 26(5):521-562. PMC: 3062901. DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1. View

5.
Levy N . Due deference to denialism: explaining ordinary people's rejection of established scientific findings. Synthese. 2019; 196(1):313-327. PMC: 6338713. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-017-1477-x. View