Do Your Own Research!
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Philosophical tradition and conspiracy theorists converge in suggesting that ordinary people ought to do their own research, rather than accept the word of others. In this paper, I argue that it's no accident that conspiracy theorists value lay research on expert topics: such research is likely to undermine knowledge, via its effects on truth and justification. Accepting expert testimony is a far more reliable route to truth. Nevertheless, lay research has a range of benefits; in particular, it is likely to lead to greater understanding, even when it does not lead to knowledge. I argue that we can reap most of the genuine benefits of lay research while minimizing the risks by engaging in exploratory, rather than truth-directed, inquiry. To engage in exploratory inquiry is to engage dogmatically, expecting to be unable to confirm the expert view or to disconfirm rivals.
Mokwenye R J Prim Care Community Health. 2024; 15():21501319241291786.
PMID: 39431639 PMC: 11503823. DOI: 10.1177/21501319241291786.
Bad social norms rather than bad believers: examining the role of social norms in bad beliefs.
Muller B Synthese. 2024; 203(2):63.
PMID: 38356922 PMC: 10861743. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-024-04483-5.
Levy N Philos Stud. 2023; 180(10-11):3141-3160.
PMID: 37786461 PMC: 10541816. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-023-02031-4.