» Articles » PMID: 36029372

Among High Responders, is Oocyte Development Potential Different in Rotterdam Consensus PCOS Vs Non-PCOS Patients Undergoing IVF?

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Aug 27
PMID 36029372
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the oocyte potential to develop to blastocyst in Rotterdam consensus PCOS in women with hyper-responses requiring freeze-all embryos.

Methods: Retrospective, single-academic center, cohort study of 205 patients who underwent freeze-all antagonist IVF cycles for OHSS risk between 2013 and 2019. Women in the PCOS group (n = 88) were diagnosed per the 2003 Rotterdam criteria. Control patients (n = 122) had no evidence of hyperandrogenism or menstrual disturbance. Data was compared by t-tests, chi-squared tests, or multivariate logistic regression (SPSS). Frozen blastocysts were Gardner's grade BB or better.

Results: There was no difference in terms of number of oocytes collected (PCOS vs non-PCOS 27.7 ± 9.4 vs 25.9 ± 8.2, p = 0.157), number of MII (20.7 ± 8.0 vs 19.1 ± 6.6, p = 0.130), number of 2PN fertilized (15.6 ± 7.4 vs 14.4 ± 5.9, p = 0.220), and number of frozen blastocysts (7.8 ± 4.9 vs 7.1 ± 3.8, p = 0.272). In addition, fertilization rates (74 ± 17% vs 75 ± 17%, p = 0.730), blastulation rates per 2PN (51 ± 25% vs 51 ± 25%, p = 0.869), and blastulation rates per mature oocytes (37 ± 18% vs 37 ± 15%, p = 0.984) were all comparable between PCOS and controls, respectively. Moreover, there was no difference when comparing PCOS and controls in pregnancy rates (45/81 vs 77/122, p = 0.28) and clinical pregnancy rates (34/81 vs 54/122, p = 0.75), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression controlling for confounders failed to alter these results.

Conclusion: PCOS subjects do not seem to have altered oocyte potential as measured by number of MII oocytes collected, fertilization, and blastulation rates when compared to high-responder controls, with similar magnitude of stimulation.

References
1.
Ashkenazi J, Farhi J, Orvieto R, Homburg R, Dekel A, Feldberg D . Polycystic ovary syndrome patients as oocyte donors: the effect of ovarian stimulation protocol on the implantation rate of the recipient. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64(3):564-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57793-0. View

2.
Pellicer A, Valbuena D, Cano F, Remohi J, Simon C . Lower implantation rates in high responders: evidence for an altered endocrine milieu during the preimplantation period. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65(6):1190-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58337-x. View

3.
Plachot M, Belaisch-Allart J, Mayenga J, Chouraqui A, Tesquier A, Serkine A . [Oocyte and embryo quality in polycystic ovary syndrome]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2003; 31(4):350-4. DOI: 10.1016/s1297-9589(03)00059-6. View

4.
Urman B, Tiras B, Yakin K . Assisted reproduction in the treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004; 8(4):419-30. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60926-1. View

5.
Kdous M, Chaker A, Zhioua A, Zhioua F . [Oocyte and embryo quality and outcome of ICSI cycles in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) versus normo-ovulatory]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009; 38(2):133-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.12.001. View