On the Nature of Perceptual Limits in Vision. A New Look at Lateral Masking

Overview

Journal Psychol Res

Specialty Psychology

Date 1986 Jan 1

PMID 3602253

Citations 9

Authors

B E Butler

A Currie

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Constraints on Letter-in-String Identification in Peripheral Vision: Effects of Number of Flankers and Deployment of Attention.

Chanceaux M, Grainger J Front Psychol. 2013; 4:119.

PMID: 23494610 PMC: 3595509. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00119.

Saccadic selection and crowding in visual search: stronger lateral masking leads to shorter search times.

de Vries J, Hooge I, Wiering M, Verstraten F Exp Brain Res. 2011; 211(1):119-31.

PMID: 21484396 PMC: 3084938. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2660-9.

Precision of position signals for letters.

Chung S, Legge G Vision Res. 2009; 49(15):1948-60.

PMID: 19460396 PMC: 2728219. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.004.

How important is lateral masking in visual search?.

Wertheim A, Hooge I, Krikke K, Johnson A Exp Brain Res. 2005; 170(3):387-402.

PMID: 16328267 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0221-9.

Perceptual integration of identity, location and colour.

Styles E, Allport D Psychol Res. 1986; 48(4):189-200.

PMID: 3602252 DOI: 10.1007/BF00309083.

References

Butler B . Selective attention and stimulus localization in visual perception. Can J Psychol. 1980; 34(2):119-33. DOI: 10.1037/h0081029. View

Mewhort D, Campbell A . Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effect. Percept Psychophys. 1978; 24(1):93-101. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202978. View

Butler B . Identification and localization in tachistoscopic recognition: the effects of data- and resource-limitations. Can J Psychol. 1981; 35(1):36-51. DOI: 10.1037/h0081121. View

Butler B . The category effect in visual search: identification versus localization factors. Can J Psychol. 1980; 34(3):238-47. DOI: 10.1037/h0081054. View

van der Heijden A . On selection in vision. Psychol Res. 1986; 48(4):211-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00309085. View

van der Heijden A, Hagenaar R, Bloem W . Two stages in postcategorical filtering and selection. Mem Cognit. 1984; 12(5):458-69. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198307. View

van der Heijden A . Postcategorical filtering in a bar-probe task. Mem Cognit. 1984; 12(5):446-57. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198306. View

Massaro D, Klitzke D . The role of lateral masking and orthographic structure in letter and word recognition. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1979; 43(5):413-26. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(79)90033-7. View

Butler B . The limits of selective attention in tachistoscopic recognition. Can J Psychol. 1974; 28(2):199-213. DOI: 10.1037/h0081987. View

10.

Pashler H . Evidence against late selection: stimulus quality effects in previewed displays. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984; 10(3):429-48. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.3.429. View

11.

Mewhort D, Campbell A, Marchetti F, Campbell J . Identification, localization, and "iconic memory": an evaluation of the bar-probe task. Mem Cognit. 1981; 9(1):50-67. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196951. View

12.

Butler B, MORRISON I . Do letter features migrate? A note of caution. Psychol Res. 1984; 46(3):223-36. DOI: 10.1007/BF00308885. View

13.

TREVARTHEN C . Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychol Forsch. 1968; 31(4):299-348. DOI: 10.1007/BF00422717. View

14.

Breitmeyer B, KROPFL W, JULESZ B . The existence and role of retinotopic and spatiotopic forms of visual persistence. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1982; 52(3):175-96. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(82)90007-5. View

15.

Mewhort D, Leppmann K . Information persistence: testing spatial and identity information with a voice probe. Psychol Res. 1985; 47(1):51-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00309218. View

16.

Yeomans J, Irwin D . Stimulus duration and partial report performance. Percept Psychophys. 1985; 37(2):163-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202852. View

17.

Bouma H . Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature. 1970; 226(5241):177-8. DOI: 10.1038/226177a0. View

18.

Coltheart M . Iconic memory and visible persistence. Percept Psychophys. 1980; 27(3):183-228. DOI: 10.3758/bf03204258. View