» Articles » PMID: 360210

Inversion of a Behavioral Response in Bacterial Chemotaxis: Explanation at the Molecular Level

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 1978 Sep 1
PMID 360210
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Certain cheU mutants of Salmonella show inverted chemotactic behavior, being repelled by attractants and attracted by repellents. Such a dramatic change in behavioral pattern would seem at first glance to require drastic and complex alterations in the sensory processing system. In fact, the behavior can be explained by a simple shift in the level of a response regulator and the subtle effects of this shift on flagellar function. Flagella can exist in either a left-handed or a right-handed structure depending on applied torsion. Wild-type cells swim smoothly by counterclockwise rotation of a left-handed helical bundle and tumble when the motors briefly reverse to clockwise rotation (normal random motility). The cheU mutation causes a shift in response regulator level relative to the critical threshold value, resulting in extended clockwise operation so that the flagella are fully converted to the right-handed helical form. These cells therefore swim smoothly by clockwise rotation of a right-handed bundle and tumble when the motor briefly reverses to counterclockwise rotation (inverse random motility). Thus, tumbling is associated with brief reversals and not with a particular sense of rotation. A wild-type cell, with its steady-state response regulator level placing it initially in normal random motility, will swim smoothly on addition of attractant, whereas a cheU mutant with inverse random motility will tumble given the same stimulus. The phenomenon illustrates the profound behavioral consequences that can result from a single mutation in a key gene.

Citing Articles

Rotating Bacteria on Solid Surfaces without Tethering.

Dominick C, Wu X Biophys J. 2018; 115(3):588-594.

PMID: 30041887 PMC: 6084641. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.06.020.


Adaptability of non-genetic diversity in bacterial chemotaxis.

Frankel N, Pontius W, Dufour Y, Long J, Hernandez-Nunez L, Emonet T Elife. 2014; 3.

PMID: 25279698 PMC: 4210811. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.03526.


Evolution of response dynamics underlying bacterial chemotaxis.

Soyer O, Goldstein R BMC Evol Biol. 2011; 11:240.

PMID: 21846396 PMC: 3178535. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-240.


The voltage-gated Na+ channel NaVBP has a role in motility, chemotaxis, and pH homeostasis of an alkaliphilic Bacillus.

Ito M, Xu H, Guffanti A, Wei Y, Zvi L, Clapham D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(29):10566-71.

PMID: 15243157 PMC: 490023. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0402692101.


Real-time imaging of fluorescent flagellar filaments.

Turner L, Ryu W, Berg H J Bacteriol. 2000; 182(10):2793-801.

PMID: 10781548 PMC: 101988. DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.10.2793-2801.2000.


References
1.
Vogel H, Bonner D . Acetylornithinase of Escherichia coli: partial purification and some properties. J Biol Chem. 1956; 218(1):97-106. View

2.
KERRIDGE D . The effect of amino acid analogues on the synthesis of bacterial flagella. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1959; 31(2):579-81. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3002(59)90048-4. View

3.
Kamiya R, ASAKURA S . Helical transformations of Salmonella flagella in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1976; 106(1):167-86. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90306-5. View

4.
Silverman M, Simon M . Bacterial flagella. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1977; 31:397-419. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.002145. View

5.
Rubik B, Koshland Jr D . Potentiation, desensitization, and inversion of response in bacterial sensing of chemical stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978; 75(6):2820-4. PMC: 392656. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2820. View