Pilot Study of Facial and Bodily Feedback

Overview

Journal Neuropsychiatr

Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry

Date 2022 Aug 26

PMID 36018476

Authors

Chloe Hutchings-Hay

Marcela M Dapelo

Gisselle Briceno

Camila Fernandez

Kate Tchanturia

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The modulation hypothesis of facial feedback has not adequately examined how combining facial expressions and bodily postures might influence our experience of emotional stimuli. This pilot study examined a new method for manipulating both face and body together, which is important in furthering our understanding of how face and body interact to influence emotional experiences in the real world.

Methods: Using a within-subjects design, 30 participants viewed positive film clips under four conditions: (1) positive face with positive body (PP), (2) positive face with neutral body (PN), (3) neutral face with positive body (NP) and (4) neutral face with neutral body (NN). Measures of positive and negative affect were taken before and after each clip, to assess the subjective emotional experience.

Results: Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine differences in the emotional experience under each condition. Post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrated that positive affect in the PP condition was significantly higher than in the NP and NN conditions. There was no significant difference between the PP and NN conditions.

Conclusion: Whilst the study findings are difficult to interpret, this pilot study generated a number of important methodological learnings that are relevant to future research of this kind.

References

Acosta A, Adams Jr R, Albohn D, Allard E, Beek T, Benning S . Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, & Stepper (1988). Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016; 11(6):917-928. DOI: 10.1177/1745691616674458. View

WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

Noah T, Schul Y, Mayo R . When both the original study and its failed replication are correct: Feeling observed eliminates the facial-feedback effect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018; 114(5):657-664. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000121. View

Coles N, March D, Marmolejo-Ramos F, Larsen J, Arinze N, Ndukaihe I . A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration. Nat Hum Behav. 2022; 6(12):1731-1742. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01458-9. View

Price T, Dieckman L, Harmon-Jones E . Embodying approach motivation: body posture influences startle eyeblink and event-related potential responses to appetitive stimuli. Biol Psychol. 2012; 90(3):211-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.04.001. View

Nair S, Sagar M, Sollers 3rd J, Consedine N, Broadbent E . Do slumped and upright postures affect stress responses? A randomized trial. Health Psychol. 2014; 34(6):632-41. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000146. View

Wilkes C, Kydd R, Sagar M, Broadbent E . Upright posture improves affect and fatigue in people with depressive symptoms. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016; 54:143-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.07.015. View

Soussignan R . Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: a test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Emotion. 2003; 2(1):52-74. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.2.1.52. View

Kret M, Roelofs K, Stekelenburg J, de Gelder B . Emotional signals from faces, bodies and scenes influence observers' face expressions, fixations and pupil-size. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; 7:810. PMC: 3866922. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00810. View

10.

Strack F, Martin L, Stepper S . Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(5):768-77. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.768. View

11.

GELLHORN E . MOTION AND EMOTION: THE ROLE OF PROPRIOCEPTION IN THE PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF THE EMOTIONS. Psychol Rev. 1964; 71:457-72. DOI: 10.1037/h0039834. View

12.

Coles N, Larsen J, Lench H . A meta-analysis of the facial feedback literature: Effects of facial feedback on emotional experience are small and variable. Psychol Bull. 2019; 145(6):610-651. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000194. View

13.

Leppanen J, Patsalos O, Surguladze S, Kerr-Gaffney J, Williams S, Tchanturia K . Evaluation of film stimuli for the assessment of social-emotional processing: a pilot study. PeerJ. 2022; 10:e14160. PMC: 9700451. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14160. View