» Articles » PMID: 36013227

Contribution of Synthetic Data Generation Towards an Improved Patient Stratification in Palliative Care

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2022 Aug 26
PMID 36013227
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

AI model development for synthetic data generation to improve Machine Learning (ML) methodologies is an integral part of research in Computer Science and is currently being transferred to related medical fields, such as Systems Medicine and Medical Informatics. In general, the idea of personalized decision-making support based on patient data has driven the motivation of researchers in the medical domain for more than a decade, but the overall sparsity and scarcity of data are still major limitations. This is in contrast to currently applied technology that allows us to generate and analyze patient data in diverse forms, such as tabular data on health records, medical images, genomics data, or even audio and video. One solution arising to overcome these data limitations in relation to medical records is the synthetic generation of tabular data based on real world data. Consequently, ML-assisted decision-support can be interpreted more conveniently, using more relevant patient data at hand. At a methodological level, several state-of-the-art ML algorithms generate and derive decisions from such data. However, there remain key issues that hinder a broad practical implementation in real-life clinical settings. In this review, we will give for the first time insights towards current perspectives and potential impacts of using synthetic data generation in palliative care screening because it is a challenging prime example of highly individualized, sparsely available patient information. Taken together, the reader will obtain initial starting points and suitable solutions relevant for generating and using synthetic data for ML-based screenings in palliative care and beyond.

Citing Articles

Leveraging the Academic Artificial Intelligence Silecosystem to Advance the Community Oncology Enterprise.

McDonnell K J Clin Med. 2023; 12(14).

PMID: 37510945 PMC: 10381436. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144830.


Ten Topics to Get Started in Medical Informatics Research.

Wolfien M, Ahmadi N, Fitzer K, Grummt S, Heine K, Jung I J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45948.

PMID: 37486754 PMC: 10407648. DOI: 10.2196/45948.

References
1.
Glare P, Plakovic K, Schloms A, Egan B, Epstein A, Kelsen D . Study using the NCCN guidelines for palliative care to screen patients for palliative care needs and referral to palliative care specialists. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013; 11(9):1087-96. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0130. View

2.
Schenker Y, Arnold R . The Next Era of Palliative Care. JAMA. 2015; 314(15):1565-6. PMC: 4870044. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.11217. View

3.
Kavalieratos D, Corbelli J, Zhang D, Dionne-Odom J, Ernecoff N, Hanmer J . Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016; 316(20):2104-2114. PMC: 5226373. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.16840. View

4.
La Cava W, Bauer C, Moore J, Pendergrass S . Interpretation of machine learning predictions for patient outcomes in electronic health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2020; 2019:572-581. PMC: 7153071. View

5.
Hui D, Cherny N, Wu J, Liu D, Latino N, Strasser F . Indicators of integration at ESMO Designated Centres of Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care. ESMO Open. 2018; 3(5):e000372. PMC: 6045723. DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000372. View