» Articles » PMID: 36013076

Physical Activity Level and Perspectives of Participants Transitioning from Onsite to Virtual Cardiac Rehabilitation During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Aug 26
PMID 36013076
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This mixed-method study aimed to compare physical activity (PA) patterns of a cross-over cardiac rehabilitation (CR) cohort with a center-based CR cohort and to explore barriers and facilitators of participants transitioning and engaging in virtual CR. It included the retrospective self-reported PA of a cross-over CR cohort (n = 75) and a matched center-based CR cohort (n = 75). Some of the participants included in the cross-over cohort (n = 12) attended semi-structured focus group sessions and results were interpreted in the context of the PRECEDE-PROCEED model. Differences between groups were not observed (p > 0.05). The center-based CR cohort increased exercise frequency (p = 0.002), duration (p = 0.007), and MET/minutes (p = 0.007) over time. The cross-over cohort increased exercise duration (p = 0.04) with no significant change in any other parameters. Analysis from focus groups revealed six overarching themes classified under predisposing factors (knowledge), enabling factors (external support, COVID-19 restrictions, mental health, personal reasons/preferences), and reinforcing factors (recommendations). These findings suggest an improvement of the PA levels of center-based CR cohort participants pre-pandemic and mitigated improvement in those who transitioned to a virtual CR early in the pandemic. Improving patients’ exercise-related knowledge, provider endorsements, and the implementation of group videoconferencing sessions could help overcome barriers to participation in virtual CR.

Citing Articles

Cardiac rehabilitation patient perspectives during COVID-19 pandemic: quantitative and qualitative study.

Jug B, Sedlar Kobe N, Stojinic D, Lainscak M, Farkas J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1373684.

PMID: 39139755 PMC: 11319166. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1373684.

References
1.
Hjelm N . Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2005; 11(2):60-70. DOI: 10.1258/1357633053499886. View

2.
Leon A, Franklin B, Costa F, Balady G, Berra K, Stewart K . Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council.... Circulation. 2005; 111(3):369-76. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151788.08740.5C. View

3.
Richardson S, Hirsch J, Narasimhan M, Crawford J, McGinn T, Davidson K . Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020; 323(20):2052-2059. PMC: 7177629. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775. View

4.
Long L, Anderson L, Dewhirst A, He J, Bridges C, Gandhi M . Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with stable angina. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 2:CD012786. PMC: 6491173. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012786.pub2. View

5.
Tadas S, Coyle D . Barriers to and Facilitators of Technology in Cardiac Rehabilitation and Self-Management: Systematic Qualitative Grounded Theory Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(11):e18025. PMC: 7688378. DOI: 10.2196/18025. View