» Articles » PMID: 36011625

Investigating Employment Quality for Population Health and Health Equity: A Perspective of Power

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Aug 26
PMID 36011625
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Employment quality (EQ) has gained increasing attention as a determinant of health, but the debate among occupational health researchers over the measurement of EQ poses a challenge to advancing the literature. This is especially problematic when the concept is used across social, cultural, and national borders, as EQ is shaped by power dynamics within sociopolitical and economic contexts that are specific to each society. Investigating EQ in context could help develop a clearer understanding as to why EQ is configured in certain ways, how best EQ could be measured, how EQ impacts health, and ultimately how EQ could be improved. In this paper, we propose that attention to social context-and in particular power-may help advance the research on EQ and health. We present an allegory, or a visual description, that articulates the power balance in the employer-worker relation as well as in the sociopolitical context in which the employer-worker relation takes place. We end by proposing specific approaches for occupational health researchers to incorporate a perspective of power in EQ research that may clarify the concept and measurement of EQ. A clearer recognition of EQ as a product of power in social context aligns with the research approach of addressing work as a social structural determinant of health.

Citing Articles

A Qualitative Analysis of Immigrant Latinx Housecleaners' Experiences of How Power Relations With "Employers" Influence Working Conditions in New York City: The Safe and Just Cleaners Study.

Cuervo I, Baron S, Flores D, Gonzalez A, Harari H Am J Ind Med. 2025; 68(4):368-378.

PMID: 39865450 PMC: 11903145. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23705.


Could Better-Quality Employment Improve Population Health? Findings From a Scoping Review of Multi-Dimensional Employment Quality Research and a Proposed Research Direction.

Ahonen E, Winkler M, Bosmans K, Gunn V, Julia M Am J Ind Med. 2025; 68(3):225-249.

PMID: 39815682 PMC: 11834947. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23695.


Precarious employment and mental health in the United States: Results from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 2008-2021.

Lundstrom E, Asfaw A, Steege A, Bhattacharya A, Groenewold M Prev Med. 2024; 186:108090.

PMID: 39098343 PMC: 11370106. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108090.


Multiple Job Holding, Job Changes, and Associations with Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy-Related Hypertension in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Omari A, Siegel M, Rocheleau C, Fujishiro K, Van Buren K, Shi D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(5).

PMID: 38791833 PMC: 11121455. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21050619.


Bringing home the benefits: do pro-family employee benefits mitigate the risk of depression from competing workplace and domestic labor roles?.

Platt J, Bates L, Jager J, McLaughlin K, Keyes K Am J Epidemiol. 2024; 193(10):1362-1371.

PMID: 38679465 PMC: 11458195. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwae055.


References
1.
Vancea M, Utzet M . How unemployment and precarious employment affect the health of young people: A scoping study on social determinants. Scand J Public Health. 2016; 45(1):73-84. DOI: 10.1177/1403494816679555. View

2.
Beckfield J, Krieger N . Epi + demos + cracy: linking political systems and priorities to the magnitude of health inequities--evidence, gaps, and a research agenda. Epidemiol Rev. 2009; 31:152-77. DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxp002. View

3.
Oddo V, Zhuang C, Andrea S, Eisenberg-Guyot J, Peckham T, Jacoby D . Changes in precarious employment in the United States: A longitudinal analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020; 47(3):171-180. PMC: 8126438. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3939. View

4.
Peckham T, Fujishiro K, Hajat A, Flaherty B, Seixas N . Evaluating Employment Quality as a Determinant of Health in a Changing Labor Market. RSF. 2019; 5(4):258-281. PMC: 6756794. DOI: 10.7758/RSF.2019.5.4.09. View

5.
De Moortel D, Vandenheede H, Vanroelen C . Contemporary employment arrangements and mental well-being in men and women across Europe: a cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2014; 13(1):90. PMC: 4219120. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-014-0090-6. View