» Articles » PMID: 36007980

Asthma Control with ICS-formoterol Reliever Versus Maintenance ICS and SABA Reliever Therapy: a Post Hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Controlled Trials

Abstract

Background: In randomised controlled trials, as-needed inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol reliever therapy reduces severe exacerbation risk compared with maintenance ICS plus short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) reliever in adolescent and adult asthma, but results in slightly worse control of asthma symptoms, as measured by mean Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) score.

Objective: To assess the levels and changes in asthma control for as-needed budesonide-formoterol versus maintenance budesonide plus SABA in post hoc analyses from the Novel START and PRACTICAL clinical trials.

Methods: The number and proportion of participants at study end in each ACQ-5 category ('well-controlled', 'partly controlled' or 'inadequately controlled' symptoms), and in each responder category based on the minimal clinically important difference for ACQ-5 of 0.5 (improved, no change and worse) with as-needed budesonide-formoterol and maintenance budesonide plus SABA treatment were calculated.

Results: With last observation carried forwards, 189/214 (88.3%) and 354/434 (81.6%) of patients in the budesonide-formoterol group had 'well-controlled' or 'partly controlled' symptoms at the end of the study, vs 183/214 (85.5%) and 358/431 (83.1%) in the budesonide maintenance group, for Novel START and PRACTICAL, respectively. The proportion of patients whose symptom control was either improved or unchanged from baseline was 190/214 (88.8%) and 368/434 (84.8%) for budesonide-formoterol, vs 185/214 (86.4%) and 376/431 (87.2%) for maintenance budesonide, in Novel START and PRACTICAL respectively.

Conclusions: There were no clinically important differences in the proportions of patients with 'well-controlled' or 'partly controlled' asthma symptoms, or proportions who improved or maintained their level of control, with as-needed budesonide-formoterol versus maintenance budesonide plus SABA.

Citing Articles

Effect of randomized treatment withdrawal of budesonide oral suspension on clinically relevant efficacy outcomes in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis: a post hoc analysis.

Dellon E, Collins M, Katzka D, Mukkada V, Falk G, Zhang W Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024; 17:17562848241307602.

PMID: 39735351 PMC: 11672502. DOI: 10.1177/17562848241307602.


Can we measure whether asthma guidelines lead to improved care?.

Tan R, Murphy A, Brightling C, Shaw D NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2024; 34(1):16.

PMID: 38937520 PMC: 11211455. DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00379-6.


Independent risk factors of asthma exacerbations: 3-year follow-up in a single-center prospective cohort study.

He S, Lin W, Zhong J, Zheng X, Jin Y, Cao C Ann Transl Med. 2023; 10(24):1353.

PMID: 36660650 PMC: 9843323. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-5918.

References
1.
Bateman E, Reddel H, OByrne P, Barnes P, Zhong N, Keen C . As-Needed Budesonide-Formoterol versus Maintenance Budesonide in Mild Asthma. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(20):1877-1887. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1715275. View

2.
Juniper E, Svensson K, Mork A, Stahl E . Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire. Respir Med. 2005; 99(5):553-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.10.008. View

3.
Hatter L, Bruce P, Braithwaite I, Holliday M, Fingleton J, Weatherall M . ICS-formoterol reliever ICS and short-acting β-agonist reliever in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(1). PMC: 7836558. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00701-2020. View

4.
Rogliani P, Ritondo B, Ora J, Cazzola M, Calzetta L . SMART and as-needed therapies in mild-to-severe asthma: a network meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020; 56(3). DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00625-2020. View

5.
Williams L, Joseph C, Peterson E, Wells K, Wang M, Chowdhry V . Patients with asthma who do not fill their inhaled corticosteroids: a study of primary nonadherence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007; 120(5):1153-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.020. View