» Articles » PMID: 36003726

Hybrid Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal JTCVS Open
Date 2022 Aug 25
PMID 36003726
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Both catheter and surgical ablation strategies offer effective treatments of atrial fibrillation (AF). The hybrid (joint surgical and catheter) ablation for AF is an emerging rhythm control strategy. We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of hybrid ablation of AF.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis interrogating PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from January 1, 1991, to November 30, 2017, using the following search terms: "Cox-maze," "mini-maze," "ablation methods (including radiofrequency, cryoablation, cryomaze)," and "surgery." Included studies required ablation procedures to be hybrid and report rhythm follow-up.

Results: We included 925 patients with AF (38% persistent, 51% longstanding persistent) from 22 single-center studies (mean follow-up of 19 months). The surgical lesion set consisted of pulmonary vein isolation (n = 11) or box lesion (n = 11) with variable additional linear ablation. This was followed by sequential (n = 9), staged (n = 9), or combination (n = 4) catheter-based ablation to ensure isolation of pulmonary veins and to facilitate additional ablation or consolidation of surgically ablated lines. Overall, sinus rhythm maintenance was 79.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.4-85.7] and 70.7% (95% CI, 62.2-78.7) with and without antiarrhythmic drugs, respectively at 19 ± 25 (range, 6-128) months. The use of the bipolar AtriCure Synergy system and left atrial appendage exclusion conferred superior rhythm outcome without antiarrhythmic drugs ( ≤ .01). The overall complication rate was 6.5% (95% CI, 3.4-10.2): mortality 0.2% (95% CI, 0-0.9); stroke 0.3% (95% CI, 0-1.1); reoperation for bleeding 1.6% (95% CI, 0.6-3.0); permanent pacing ~0% (95% CI, 0-0.5); conversion to sternotomy 0.3% (95% CI, 0-1.1); atrioesophageal fistula ~0% (95% CI, 0-0.5); and phrenic nerve injury 0.3% (95% CI, 0-1.1).

Conclusions: Hybrid ablation therapy for AF demonstrates favorable rhythm outcome with acceptable complication rates.

Citing Articles

Long-Term Outcomes after Convergent Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation.

Gersak B, Podlogar V, Prolic Kalinsek T, Jan M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39336997 PMC: 11432606. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185508.


Hybrid convergent procedure with proactive oesophageal cooling for the treatment of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a case series.

Velasco A, Buch C, Hui D, Joseph C, Onsager D, Zagrodzky W Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024; 8(7):ytae301.

PMID: 38966596 PMC: 11223606. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae301.


Robotic-enhanced hybrid ablation for persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation: Early assessment of feasibility, safety, and efficacy.

Schena S, Lindemann J, Carlson A, Wilcox T, Oujiri J, Berger M JTCVS Tech. 2024; 25:81-93.

PMID: 38899102 PMC: 11184487. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.02.013.


Hybrid strategies for stand-alone surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Rosati F, Baudo M, DAlonzo M, Di Bacco L, Arabia G, Muneretto C Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 13(1):44-53.

PMID: 38380141 PMC: 10875201. DOI: 10.21037/acs-2023-afm-0120.


Catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A review.

Hassouna S, Osmancik P Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2024; 168(1):1-14.

PMID: 38230517 DOI: 10.5507/bp.2023.053.


References
1.
Ad N, Henry L, Friehling T, Wish M, Holmes S . Minimally invasive stand-alone Cox-maze procedure for patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 96(3):792-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.007. View

2.
Zembala M, Filipiak K, Kowalski O, Boidol J, Sokal A, Lenarczyk R . Minimally invasive hybrid ablation procedure for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: one year results. Kardiol Pol. 2012; 70(8):819-28. View

3.
Gersak B, Pernat A, Robic B, Sinkovec M . Low rate of atrial fibrillation recurrence verified by implantable loop recorder monitoring following a convergent epicardial and endocardial ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23(10):1059-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02355.x. View

4.
Krul S, Driessen A, van Boven W, Linnenbank A, Geuzebroek G, Jackman W . Thoracoscopic video-assisted pulmonary vein antrum isolation, ganglionated plexus ablation, and periprocedural confirmation of ablation lesions: first results of a hybrid surgical-electrophysiological approach for atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4(3):262-70. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.961862. View

5.
de Asmundis C, Chierchia G, Mugnai G, Van Loo I, Nijs J, Czapla J . Midterm clinical outcomes of concomitant thoracoscopic epicardial and transcatheter endocardial ablation for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a single-centre experience. Europace. 2016; 19(1):58-65. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw026. View