A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, Sound, and Reading

Overview

Journal Mem Cognit

Specialty Psychology

Date 1987 May 1

PMID 3600258

Citations 102

Authors

G C Van Orden

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

The Beijing Sentence Corpus II: A cross-script comparison between traditional and simplified Chinese sentence reading.

Yan M, Pan J, Kliegl R Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(2):60.

PMID: 39825023 PMC: 11748476. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02523-z.

Linguistic Illusions Guide Eye Movement: Evidence From Doubling.

Andan Q, Bex P, Berent I J Psycholinguist Res. 2023; 52(6):2811-2833.

PMID: 37824032 PMC: 10703976. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-023-10023-y.

No Correlation Between Articulation Speed and Silent Reading Rate when Adults Read Short Texts.

Brysbaert M, Vantieghem A Psychol Belg. 2023; 63(1):82-91.

PMID: 37483467 PMC: 10360968. DOI: 10.5334/pb.1189.

Effects of orthographic transparency on rhyme judgement.

Yee J, Yap N, Mahmud R, Saripan M Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1038630.

PMID: 36949909 PMC: 10026565. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1038630.

PHOR-in-One: A multilingual lexical database with PHonological, ORthographic and PHonographic word similarity estimates in four languages.

Costa A, Comesana M, Soares A Behav Res Methods. 2022; 55(7):3699-3725.

PMID: 36344773 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01985-3.

References

Seidenberg M . The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition. 1985; 19(1):1-30. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90029-0. View

Becker C . Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1976; 2(4):556-66. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.2.4.556. View

Fowler C, Napps S, Feldman L . Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Mem Cognit. 1985; 13(3):241-55. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197687. View

Sutton R, Barto A . Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. Psychol Rev. 1981; 88(2):135-70. View

Bauer D, Stanovich K . Lexical access and the spelling-to-sound regularity effect. Mem Cognit. 1980; 8(5):424-32. DOI: 10.3758/bf03211139. View

Rosson M . The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud. Mem Cognit. 1985; 13(1):90-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198448. View

Waters G, Seidenberg M, Bruck M . Children's and adults' use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Mem Cognit. 1984; 12(3):293-305. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197678. View

Becker C . Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies. Mem Cognit. 1980; 8(6):493-512. DOI: 10.3758/bf03213769. View

Paap K, Newsome S, McDonald J, Schvaneveldt R . An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. Psychol Rev. 1982; 89(5):573-94. View

10.

Underwood G, Thwaites S . Automatic phonological coding of unattended printed words. Mem Cognit. 1982; 10(5):434-42. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197645. View

11.

Doctor E, Coltheart M . Children's use of phonological encoding when reading for meaning. Mem Cognit. 1980; 8(3):195-209. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197607. View

12.

Taft M . Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Mem Cognit. 1979; 7(4):263-72. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197599. View

13.

Van Orden G, Johnston J, Hale B . Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988; 14(3):371-86. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.371. View

14.

Waters G, Seidenberg M . Spelling-sound effects in reading: time-course and decision criteria. Mem Cognit. 1985; 13(6):557-72. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198326. View

15.

Grossberg S, Stone G . Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, learning, and resonance. Psychol Rev. 1986; 93(1):46-74. View

16.

McClelland J, Rumelhart D . Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1985; 114(2):159-97. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.114.2.159. View

17.

Hawkins H, Reicher G, Rogers M, Peterson L . Flexible coding in word recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1976; 2(3):380-5. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.2.3.380. View

18.

Reicher G . Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. J Exp Psychol. 1969; 81(2):275-80. DOI: 10.1037/h0027768. View

19.

Rumelhart D, McClelland J . An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychol Rev. 1982; 89(1):60-94. View