» Articles » PMID: 36002549

Multi-temperature Experiments to Ease Analysis of Heterogeneous Binder Solutions by Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensing

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Aug 24
PMID 36002549
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) biosensing is a well-established tool for the investigation of binding kinetics between a soluble species and an immobilized (bio)molecule. While robust and accurate data analysis techniques are readily available for single species, methods to exploit data collected with a solution containing multiple interactants are scarce. In a previous study, our group proposed two data analysis algorithms for (1) the precise and reliable identification of the kinetic parameters of N interactants present at different ratios in N mixtures and (2) the estimation of the composition of a given mixture, assuming that the kinetic parameters and the total concentration of all interactants are known. Here, we extend the first algorithm by reducing the number of necessary mixtures. This is achieved by conducting experiments at different temperatures. Through the Van't Hoff and Eyring equations, identifying the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of N binders becomes possible with M mixtures with M comprised between 2 and N and at least N/M temperatures. The second algorithm is improved by adding the total analyte concentration as a supplementary variable to be identified in an optimization routine. We validated our analysis framework experimentally with a system consisting of mixtures of low molecular weight drugs, each competing to bind to an immobilized protein. We believe that the analysis of mixtures and composition estimation could pave the way for SPR biosensing to become a bioprocess monitoring tool, on top of expanding its already substantial role in drug discovery and development.

Citing Articles

Surface plasmon resonance, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation studies of lysozyme interaction with tannic acid.

Turkoglu E, Tastekil I, Sarica P Food Sci Nutr. 2024; 12(10):7392-7404.

PMID: 39479698 PMC: 11521726. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.4315.

References
1.
Mason T, Pineda A, Wofsy C, Goldstein B . Effective rate models for the analysis of transport-dependent biosensor data. Math Biosci. 1999; 159(2):123-44. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-5564(99)00023-1. View

2.
Cambay F, Forest-Nault C, Dumoulin L, Seguin A, Henry O, Durocher Y . Glycosylation of Fcγ receptors influences their interaction with various IgG1 glycoforms. Mol Immunol. 2020; 121:144-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.03.010. View

3.
Pol E, Roos H, Markey F, Elwinger F, Shaw A, Karlsson R . Evaluation of calibration-free concentration analysis provided by Biacore™ systems. Anal Biochem. 2016; 510:88-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.07.009. View

4.
Mehand M, Srinivasan B, De Crescenzo G . Estimation of analyte concentration by surface plasmon resonance-based biosensing using parameter identification techniques. Anal Biochem. 2011; 419(2):140-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.08.051. View

5.
Day Y, Baird C, Rich R, Myszka D . Direct comparison of binding equilibrium, thermodynamic, and rate constants determined by surface- and solution-based biophysical methods. Protein Sci. 2002; 11(5):1017-25. PMC: 2373566. DOI: 10.1110/ps.4330102. View